Abstract:How and why the presence of a person directly affects the perception and action of another person is a phenomenon that has been approached in a limited and piecemeal fashion within psychology. This kind of diffuse strategy has failed to capture the jointness of perception and action within and between people. In contradistinction, the authors offer a perspective that retains both integrally social features (e.g., involves interaction) and yet adequately exploits the current state of knowledge regarding the ecological properties of perception–action, while at the same time drawing on aspects of dynamic systems theory. In this article the authors review the best attempts to examine how one individual affects another's perceptions and actions in the emergence of a social unit of action. Two important approaches, the individual-level and cognitive dynamics approaches, have yielded insights that derive in significant degree from principles of ecological psychology and/or dynamical systems theory. Prototypic of the individual-level approach is a focus on what can be perceived by coactors with the aim of uncovering how the dispositional qualities (affordances) of another person are informationally specified during social interaction. In contrast, the cognitive dynamics approach simulates dynamical characteristics of cognition and psychological influence with the aim of uncovering how cooperative interaction emerges out of its component parts. The authors argue that these approaches involve, respectively, insufficient mutuality and insufficient embodiment. Consequently, a social synergy perspective is discussed that approaches the problem of socially cooperative interaction at the relational, nonreductive level, using novel methods to examine how social perception and action emerge through self-organizing processes. The coupling of Gibson's ideas with those of Bernstein forms a natural basis for looking at the traditional psychological topics of perceiving, acting, and knowing as activities of ecosystems rather than isolated animals. (Shaw, Mace, & Turvey, 2001, p. xiv)

Intention Prediction is Affordance Perception

Intention regulates conflicting desires in human decision making

Social Constraints from an Observer's Perspective: Coordinated Actions Make an Agent's Position More Predictable.

Beyond Observation: Manipulating Circumstances to Detect Affordances and Infer Traits

Mind in action: expanding the concept of affordance

Extending Affordances with Evolutionary Psychology and Connectionist Models: An Essay in Honor of Reuben Baron

I see actions. Affordances and the expressive role of perceptual judgments

What can I do here? A Theory of Affordances in Reinforcement Learning

Rediscovering Affordance: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective

Intention Beyond Desire: Humans Spontaneously Commit to Future Actions.

Forward-Looking Aspects of Perception–Action Coupling as a Basis for Embodied Communication

Inferring Human Intentions from Predicted Action Probabilities

Intention Beyond Desire: Commitment in Human Action

Using modified incremental chart parsing to ascribe intentions to animated geometric figures

Contrasting Approaches to Perceiving and Acting With Others

A predictive processing model of perception and action for self-other distinction

Behavioral and neural evidence for perceptual predictions in social interactions

Cues to intention: the role of movement information

Reasoning on Grasp-Action Affordances

Planning and representing intentional action

Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave towards a target and look solely at how the target behaves