Abstract:STUDY DESIGN: A new surgical strategy for treatment of patients with spinal metastases was designed, and 61 patients were treated based on this strategy.OBJECTIVES: To propose a new surgical strategy for the treatment of patients with spinal metastases.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A preoperative score composed of six parameters has been proposed by Tokuhashi et al for the prognostic assessment of patients with metastases to the spine. Their scoring system was designed for deciding between excisional or palliative procedures. Recently, aggressive surgery, such as total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal metastases, has been advocated for selected patients. Surgical strategies should include various treatments ranging from wide or marginal excision to palliative treatment with hospice care.METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with spinal metastases who had been treated from 1987-1991 were reviewed, and prognostic factors were evaluated retrospectively (phase 1). A new scoring system for spinal metastases that was designed based on these data consists of three prognostic factors: 1) grade of malignancy (slow growth, 1 point; moderate growth, 2 points; rapid growth, 4 points), 2) visceral metastases (no metastasis, 0 points; treatable, 2 points: untreatable, 4 points), and 3) bone metastases (solitary or isolated, 1 point; multiple, 2 points). These three factors were added together to give a prognostic score between 2-10. The treatment goal for each patient was set according to this prognostic score. The strategy for each patient was decided along with the treatment goal: a prognostic score of 2-3 points suggested a wide or marginal excision for long-term local control; 4-5 points indicated marginal or intralesional excision for middle-term local control; 6-7 points justified palliative surgery for short-term palliation; and 8-10 points indicated nonoperative supportive care. Sixty-one patients were treated prospectively according to this surgical strategy between 1993-1996 (phase 2). The extent of the spinal metastases was stratified using the surgical classification of spinal tumors, and technically appropriate and feasible surgery was performed, such as en bloc spondylectomy, piecemeal thorough excision, curettage, or palliative surgery.RESULTS: The mean survival time of the 28 patients treated with wide or marginal excision was 38.2 months (26 had successful local control). The mean survival time of the 13 patients treated with intralesional excision was 21.5 months (nine had successful local control). The mean survival time of the 11 patients treated with palliative surgery and stabilization was 10.1 months (eight had successful local control). The mean survival time of the patients with terminal care was 5.3 months.CONCLUSIONS: A new surgical strategy for spinal metastases based on the prognostic scoring system is proposed. This strategy provides appropriate guidelines for treatment in all patients with spinal metastases.

Can Survival Scoring Systems for Spinal Metastases be Used to Predict Postoperative Neurologic Recovery? A Retrospective Study on 204 Patients With Thoracolumbar Metastases Treated at a Tertiary Center

Risk factors and prognosis of surgery for spinal metastasis

Scoring Algorithms for Predicting Survival Prognosis in Patients With Metastatic Spinal Disease <i>The Current Status and Future Directions</i>

The emergence of new prognostic scores in lung cancer patients with spinal metastasis: A 12-year single-center retrospective study

Comparison of three predictive scoring systems for morbidity in oncological spine surgery

A novel prognostic scoring system combining the revised Tokuhashi score and the New England spinal metastasis score for preoperative evaluation of spinal metastases

Modified Score Based on Revised Tokuhashi Score is Needed for the Determination of Surgical Intervention in Patients with Lung Cancer Metastases to the Spine

Effect of surgical decompression of spinal metastases in acute treatment – Predictors of neurological outcome

Which Prognostic Model Best Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Spinal Metastases? A Comparative Analysis of 8 Scoring Systems

Evaluation of prognostic preoperative factors in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases: Results in a consecutive series of 81 cases

Prognostic scoring system for metastatic spine tumors derived from hepatocellular carcinoma

Predicting Survival with Brain Metastases in the Stereotactic Radiosurgery Era: are Existing Prognostic Scores Still Relevant? Or Can we do Better?

Preoperative Performance Status Threshold for Favorable Surgical Outcome in Metastatic Spine Disease

Surgical Strategy for Spinal Metastases

Prognostic Factors of Moter Function after Surgery for Patients with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Stduy

Prognostic factors of surgical treatment for spinal metastases of breast cancer

The preoperative evaluation of spinal metastases

Development and Validation of a Novel Survival Prediction Model in Patients with Spinal Metastasis from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

The Recovered Independent Ambulation Rate and Prognostic Factors of Non-ambulatory Patients After Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Surgery

[Surgical Management and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Spinal Metastatic Tumors].

Characteristics of Patients Who Survived < 3 Months or > 2 Years after Surgery for Spinal Metastases: Can We Avoid Inappropriate Patient Selection?