Abstract:BackgroundMembers of the genus Bifidobacterium are anaerobic Gram-positive Actinobacteria, which are natural inhabitants of human and animal gastrointestinal tract. Certain bifidobacteria are frequently used as food additives and probiotic pharmaceuticals, because of their various health-promoting properties.Due to the enormous demand on probiotic bacteria, manufacture of high-quality products containing living microorganisms requires rapid and accurate identification of specific bacteria. Additionally, isolation of new industrial bacteria from various environments may lead to multiple isolations of the same strain, therefore, it is important to apply rapid, low-cost and effective procedures differentiating bifidobacteria at the intra-species level. The identification of new isolates using microbiological and biochemical methods is difficult, but the accurate characterization of isolated strains may be achieved using a polyphasic approach that includes classical phenotypic methods and molecular procedures. However, some of these procedures are time-consuming and cumbersome, particularly when a large group of new isolates is typed, while some other approaches may have too low discriminatory power to distinguish closely related isolates obtained from similar sources.ResultsThis work presents the evaluation of the discriminatory power of four molecular methods (ARDRA, RAPD-PCR, rep-PCR and SDS-PAGE fingerprinting) that are extensively used for fast differentiation of bifidobacteria up to the strain level. Our experiments included 17 reference strains and showed that in comparison to ARDRA, genotypic fingerprinting procedures (RAPD and rep-PCR) seemed to be less reproducible, however, they allowed to differentiate the tested microorganisms even at the intra-species level. In general, RAPD and rep-PCR have similar discriminatory power, though, in some instances more than one oligonucleotide needs to be used in random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Moreover, the results also demonstrated a high discriminatory power of SDS-PAGE fingerprinting of whole-cell proteins. On the other hand, the protein profiles obtained were rather complex, and therefore, difficult to analyze.ConclusionsAmong the tested procedures, rep-PCR proved to be the most effective and reliable method allowing rapid differentiation of Bifidobacterium strains. Additionally, the use of the BOXA1R primer in the differentiation of 21 Bifidobacterium strains, newly isolated from infant feces, demonstrated slightly better discriminatory power in comparison to PCR reactions with the (GTG)5 oligonucleotide. Thus, BOX-PCR turned out to be the most appropriate and convenient molecular technique in differentiating Bifidobacterium strains at all taxonomic levels.

Differentiation of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis by SDS-PAGE of cell-wall proteins

Molecular typing of Lactobacillus delbrueckii of dairy origin by PCR-RFLP of protein-coding genes

Disclosing Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus intraspecific diversity in exopolysaccharides production

Molecular identification and cluster analysis of homofermentative thermophilic lactobacilli isolated from dairy products

Differentiation of lactococci from 2 Greek cheeses with protected designation of origin by phenotypic criteria and RAPD-PCR

A polyphasic approach to highlight genotypic and phenotypic diversities of Lactobacillus helveticus strains isolated from dairy starter cultures and cheeses

Distinction between glycomacropeptide and β-lactoglobulin with 'stains all' dye on tricine SDS-PAGE gels

Reliable identification of lactic acid bacteria by targeted and untargeted high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry

Effectiveness of Chemometric Techniques in Discrimination of Lactobacillus helveticus Biotypes from Natural Dairy Starter Cultures on the Basis of Phenotypic Characteristics

Glycotyping and Specific Separation of Listeria monocytogenes with a Novel Bacteriophage Protein Tool Kit

Impedance microbiology to speed up the screening of lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharide production

[Molecular Diagnosis of the Specific DNA Patterns of 16S-23S Rrna Gene of Bacteria].

A Combined Tryptic Peptide and Winged Peptide Internal Standard Approach for the Determination of Α‐lactalbumin in Dairy Products by Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Comparison of various molecular methods for rapid differentiation of intestinal bifidobacteria at the species, subspecies and strain level

Isolation and characterization of exopolysaccharide-producing strains of Lactobacillus bulgaricus from curd

Volatile Flavor Compounds Profile and Fermentation Characteristics of Milk Fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus

Design of PCR assays to specifically detect and identify 37 Lactobacillus species in a single 96 well plate

In Silico Comparative Genomic Analysis Revealed a Highly Conserved Proteolytic System in Lactobacillus delbrueckii

Rapid Identification of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium by a 16S rRNA PCR Method

New Genetic Determinants for qPCR Identification and the Enumeration of Selected Lactic Acid Bacteria in Raw-Milk Cheese

Amplicon Sequencing of the slpH Locus Permits Culture-Independent Strain Typing of Lactobacillus helveticus in Dairy Products