Epidemic intelligence in Europe: a user needs perspective to foster innovation in digital health surveillance

Fanny Bouyer,Oumy Thiongane,Alexandre Hobeika,Elena Arsevska,Aurélie Binot,Déborah Corrèges,Timothée Dub,Henna Mäkelä,Esther van Kleef,Ferran Jori,Renaud Lancelot,Alize Mercier,Francesca Fagandini,Sarah Valentin,Wim Van Bortel,Claire Ruault
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18466-1
IF: 4.5
2024-04-08
BMC Public Health
Abstract:European epidemic intelligence (EI) systems receive vast amounts of information and data on disease outbreaks and potential health threats. The quantity and variety of available data sources for EI, as well as the available methods to manage and analyse these data sources, are constantly increasing. Our aim was to identify the difficulties encountered in this context and which innovations, according to EI practitioners, could improve the detection, monitoring and analysis of disease outbreaks and the emergence of new pathogens.
public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address the issues encountered in the European Epidemic Intelligence (EI) system in disease outbreak detection, monitoring, and analysis, and explores how to improve these systems through innovation. Specifically, the main objectives of the study include: 1. **Identifying Difficulties**: Identifying the difficulties encountered in handling large data sources and managing methods to analyze these data sources. 2. **Innovation Needs**: Understanding which innovations frontline practitioners believe can improve the detection, monitoring, and analysis of disease outbreaks. 3. **Strategy Adjustment**: Practitioners wish to collectively review existing EI strategies to enhance preparedness for emerging infectious diseases and adapt to the growing need for data management. 4. **Standardized Processes**: The need for timely and validated data acquisition processes, extracting information from various sources through techniques like text mining, and ensuring compliance with data protection rules. 5. **Data Interoperability**: Improving data interoperability, ensuring consistency in data quality and standardized covariate sets to facilitate national-level epidemiological assessments. 6. **Solution Exploration**: Identifying a range of tools that aid in risk detection and assessment, such as visualization, text mining, and predefined analytical tools, combined with methodological guidance. 7. **Degree of Automation**: Practitioners prefer partial rather than full automation of analysis to maintain control over data and input parameters and to flexibly adjust according to different goals and characteristics. In summary, this study aims to enhance the digital health monitoring capabilities in the fields of public health and animal health in Europe by gaining a deep understanding of the current issues in EI practices and the technological innovations needed.