Abstract:This manuscript undertakes a disciplinary self-critique of the field of implementation science, a field which attempts to bridge the gap between evidence-based interventions and their practical application. Despite the heightened emphasis on health equity and racial disparities, the field's current discourse is limited by key epistemic shortcomings. First, even though prevalence of implementation gaps between racialized groups in the United States necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the systems perpetuating these disparities, the field does not operate with a general explanation for disparities not as a failure of systems, but a system historically and structural designed to produce disparities. Second, the field has attempted to address disparities without adequate dialog with a broad tradition of anti-racist and anti-colonial sociology, history and epistemology, and therefore risks a decontextualized analysis of disparities and under-informed approaches to achieving equity. Fortunately, scholarship from the Black radical tradition (BRT), such as the Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP), Critical Race Theory (CRT), and more broadly conceptual frameworks from post-modern, anti-colonial, Black feminist studies and social epistemology can offer to implementation science frameworks that center power dynamics and racialized oppression. This epistemic re-alignment of implementation research to "center at the margins" can enable the field of implementation science to more critically examine and dismantle systems that perpetuate racial inequalities in access to and utilization of health interventions. For example, normalization and dynamic fit, which are thought to be key mechanisms of implementation, are revealed in the light of this tradition of scholarship to be potentially problematic acquiescence to oppressive systems. Drawing from the concept of resistance anchored in the scholarship of the Black radical tradition as well as contemporary social epistemology such as the work of José Medina and Maria Fricker about epistemic justice, the authors further advance that implementation science could make more substantial contributions to the dismantling of racialized systems and actively work toward health justice through the transdisciplinary lens of resistance. This is a call to action for integrating implementation science with critical philosophical and theoretical perspectives rooted in Black studies and related insights, which have been acquired through the struggle for social justice, to inform the design of implementation strategies and research projects that improve health services and health outcomes for health disparity populations.

Rethinking difference: a feminist reframing of gender/race/class for the improvement of women's health research

Resistance and Gendered Racism: Middle-Class Black Women's Experiences Navigating Reproductive Health Care Systems

ReThinking clinical reasoning: A paradigm shift

Feminism and Health in the Decade of Behavior

The stories about racism and health: the development of a framework for racism narratives in medical literature using a computational grounded theory approach

Critical Feminist Epidemiology in Action: Reflections from a Multidisciplinary Partnership Between Mujeres Unidas y Activas and Academic Researchers

Gender(ed) science: How the institutionalization of gender continues to shape the conduct and content of women's health research

Beyond ‘Doing Gender’: Incorporating Race, Class, Place, and Life Transitions into Feminist Drug Research

Black feminist theory in maternal health research: A review of concepts and future directions

Black college Women's preventive health behaviors: Applications of a Black feminist-womanist research paradigm

Situating implementation science (IS) in res(IS)tance: a conceptual frame toward the integration of scholarship from the black radical tradition

Asking MultiCrit Questions: A Reflexive and Critical Framework to Promote Health Data Equity for the Multiracial Population

Deconstructing the gender neutrality of chronic illness and disability

Women in Medicine: The Limits of Individualism in Academic Medicine

Traversing the Aging Research and Health Equity Divide: Toward Intersectional Frameworks of Research Justice and Participation

Advancing gender transformative intersectional science for health justice: An ecosocial analysis

Smashing the patriarchy to address gender health inequities: Past, present and future perspectives from Aotearoa (New Zealand)

Structural Intersectionality as a New Direction for Health Disparities Research

Putting Their Money Where Their Mouths Are: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Addressing Disparities in Health Research, Grant Funding, and Recruitment of Black Women to Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

Research Methods in the Study of Intersectionality in Psychology: Examples Informed by a Decade of Collaborative Work With Majority World Women’s Grassroots Activism

Whose Knowledge Heals? Transforming Teaching in the Struggle for Health Equity