Abstract:We apply a Bayesian agent-based framework inspired by QBism to iterations of two quantum games, the CHSH game and the quantum prisoners' dilemma. In each two-player game, players hold beliefs about an amount of shared entanglement and about the actions or beliefs of the other player. Each takes actions which maximize their expected utility and revises their beliefs with the classical Bayes rule between rounds. We simulate iterated play to see if and how players can learn about the presence of shared entanglement and to explore how their performance, their beliefs, and the game's structure interrelate. In the CHSH game, we find that players can learn that entanglement is present and use this to achieve quantum advantage. We find that they can only do so if they also believe the other player will act correctly to exploit the entanglement. In the case of low or zero entanglement in the CHSH game, the players cannot achieve quantum advantage, even in the case where they believe the entanglement is higher than it is. For the prisoners dilemma, we show that assuming 1-fold rational players (rational players who believe the other player is also rational) reduces the quantum extension [Eisert, Wilkens, and Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3077 (1999)] of the prisoners dilemma to a game with only two strategies, one of which (defect) is dominant for low entanglement, and the other (the quantum strategy Q) is dominant for high entanglement. For intermediate entanglement, neither strategy is dominant. We again show that players can learn entanglement in iterated play. We also show that strong belief in entanglement causes optimal play even in the absence of entanglement -- showing that belief in entanglement is acting as a proxy for the players trusting each other. Our work points to possible future applications in resource detection and quantum algorithm design.

Quantum solution to a three player Kolkata restaurant problem using entangled qutrits

Entanglement of Two-Qutrit System

Communication aspects of a three-player Prisoner's Dilemma quantum game

Entanglement Enhanced Multiplayer Quantum Games

Resolving game theoretical dilemmas with quantum states

A game theoretical perspective on the quantum probabilities associated with a GHZ state

Two new non-equivalent three-qubit CHSH games

Characterizing the Nash equilibria of a three-player Bayesian quantum game

Cooperative Three- and Four- Player Quantum Games

Secret Information Sharing using Multipartite Entanglement in Monty Hall Game

Quantum Model of Bertrand Duopoly

Quantum Bayesian Games

Quantum Strategy Without Entanglement

An Inequality for Entangled Qutrits in SU(3) basis

Absolutely maximally entangled state equivalence and the construction of infinite quantum solutions to the problem of 36 officers of Euler

Playing a true Parrondo's game with a three state coin on a quantum walk

Quantization of Two- and Three-player Cooperative Games Based on QRA

Quantum Multiplayer Colonel Blotto Game

Quantum Game with Incomplete Information

A Three-Player Coherent State Embezzlement Game

Quantum advice enhances social optimality in three-party conflicting interest games