Abstract:Some gauge theories with a spontaneously broken U(1) symmetry exhibit fractional Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phases around vortices in the Higgs regime. We discuss continuity between confining and Higgs regimes in such gauge theories with fundamental matter fields, focusing on the AB phases. By explicit calculations in relevant lattice models, we demonstrate that the AB phase is smoothly connected between the confining and Higgs regimes, supporting the Higgs-confinement continuity. This result provides new insight into phase structures of gauge theories with superfluidity, such as dense QCD. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.221901 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP 3 . Published by the American Physical Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the mismatch of the Aharonov - Bohm (AB) phase in Higgs - confinement continuity. Specifically, the paper explores whether the AB phase between the confinement state and the Higgs state can be smoothly connected in gauge theories with fundamental matter fields, thus supporting the hypothesis of Higgs - confinement continuity.
### Background and Problem
1. **Higgs - confinement continuity**
- Higgs - confinement continuity means that in some gauge theories, there is a smooth transition between the confinement state and the Higgs state. This concept is very important for understanding the confinement mechanism and the Brout - Englert - Higgs mechanism.
- However, the mismatch problem of the AB phase in classical solutions has always been an unsolved mystery. In the Higgs state, the AB phase is usually non - trivial, while in the confinement state, the AB phase seems to be trivial.
2. **Mismatch of the AB phase**
- In the Higgs state, the AB phase can be non - trivial due to the influence of quantum fluctuations.
- In the confinement state, since charged fields decouple in the low - energy effective theory, the AB phase is usually considered to be trivial.
- This mismatch seems to be in contradiction with Higgs - confinement continuity.
### Main Contributions of the Paper
1. **Propose solutions**
- The author proposes two possible solutions to explain the mismatch problem of the AB phase:
- **Solution A**: If there is some symmetry that constrains the AB phase to take discrete values, then the AB phase can also be non - trivial in the confinement state.
- **Solution B**: If there is no such symmetry constraint, the AB phase can change continuously between the confinement state and the Higgs state.
2. **Verify with specific models**
- **Model 1**: A lattice - version toy model, which contains a U(1) gauge field, positive and negative charge scalar fields, and a neutral scalar field. Through explicit calculations, it is proved that in the strong - coupling limit and the deep - Higgs limit, the AB phase is non - trivial.
- **Model 2**: An SU(N) Yang - Mills - Higgs model, which contains SU(N) - valued link variables, U(N) - valued fundamental scalar fields, and U(1) - valued gauge - neutral scalar fields. Also through explicit calculations, it is proved that when N = 2, the AB phase is non - trivial in both the confinement state and the Higgs state; while when N > 2, the AB phase can change continuously between the confinement state and the Higgs state.
### Conclusion
Through specific model calculations, the paper shows that the AB phase can be smoothly connected between the confinement state and the Higgs state, thus supporting the hypothesis of Higgs - confinement continuity. This result not only solves the problem of AB phase mismatch but also provides new insights into understanding quark - hadron continuity.
### Examples of Formulas
- **Definition of the AB phase**
\[
O_\Omega=\frac{\langle W(C)V(S)\rangle}{\langle W(C)\rangle\langle V(S)\rangle}
\]
where \(W(C)\) is the Wilson loop with unit winding number, and \(V(S)\) is the minimal vortex operator.
- **Action of the lattice model**
\[
S = \beta\sum_{p:\text{plaquettes}}U_p+\kappa\sum_{l:\text{links}}\left(\phi_+^xU_l\phi_+^{x'}+\phi_-^xU_l^{-1}\phi_-^{x'}+\phi_0^x\phi_0^{x'}\right)+\epsilon\sum_{v:\text{vertices}}\phi_+^v\phi_-^v\phi_0^v+\text{c.c.}
\]
These formulas and calculation results provide a solid theoretical basis for the core conclusion of the paper.