Abstract:Purpose: Single-isocenter linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a promising treatment technique for the management of multiple brain metastases. Because of the high prescription dose and steep dose gradient, SRS plans are sensitive to geometric errors, resulting in loss of target coverage and suboptimal local tumor control. Current planning techniques rely on adding a uniform and isotropic setup margin to all gross tumor volumes (GTVs) to account for rotational uncertainties. However, this setup margin may be insufficient, since the magnitude of rotational uncertainties varies and is dependent upon the distance between a GTV and the isocenter. In this study, we designed a framework to determine the optimal isocenter of a single-isocenter SRS plan for multiple brain metastases using stochastic optimization to mitigate potential errors resulting from rotational uncertainties. Methods: Planning target volumes (PTVs), defined as GTVs plus a 1-mm margin following common SRS planning convention, were assumed to be originally treated with a prescription dose and therefore covered by the prescription isodose cloud. The dose distribution, including the prescription isodose, was considered invariant assuming small rotations throughout the study. A stochastic optimization scheme was developed to determine the location of the optimal isocenter, so that the prescription dose coverage of rotated GTVs, equivalent to the intersecting volumes between the rotated GTVs and original PTVs, was maximized for any random small rotations about the isocenter. To evaluate the coverage of GTVs, the expected V 100 % undergoing random rotations was approximated as the sample average V 100 % undergoing a predetermined number of rotations. The expected V 100 % of each individual GTV and total GTVs was then compared between the plans using the optimal isocenter and the center-of-mass (CoM), respectively. Results: Twenty-two patients previously treated for multiple brain metastases in a single institute were included in this retrospective study. Each patient was initially treated for more than three brain metastases (mean: 7.6; range: 3-15) with the average GTV volume of 0.89 cc (range: 0.03-11.78 cc). The optimal isocenter found for each patient was significantly different from the CoM, with the average Euclidean distance between the optimal isocenter and the CoM being 4.36 ± 2.59 cm. The dose coverage to GTVs was also significantly improved (paired t-test; p < 0.001) when the optimal isocenter was used, with the average V 100 % of total GTVs increasing from 87.1% (standard deviation as std: 11.7%; range: 39.9-98.2%) to 94.2% (std: 5.4%; range: 77.7-99.4%). The volume of a GTV was positively correlated with the expected V 100 % regardless of the isocenter used (Spearman coefficient: ρ = 0.66 ; p < 0.001). The distance between a GTV and the isocenter was negatively correlated with the expected V 100 % when the CoM was used ( ρ = - 0.21 ; p = 0.004), however no significant correlation was found when the optimal isocenter was used ( ρ = - 0.11 ; p = 0.137). Conclusion: The proposed framework provides an effective approach to determine the optimal isocenter of single-isocenter LINAC-based SRS plans for multiple brain metastases. The implementation of the optimal isocenter results in SRS plans with consistently higher target coverage despite potential rotational uncertainties, and therefore significantly improves SRS plan robustness against random rotational uncertainties.

Multi-Criteria Optimization for Image Guidance

Multi-criteria optimization methods in radiation therapy planning: a review of technologies and directions

A Multi-Criteria Framework with Voxel-Dependent Parameters for Radiotherapy Treatment Plan Optimization

Multi-objective optimization in radiotherapy: applications to stereotactic radiosurgery and prostate brachytherapy

Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy

MO-G-304-04: Generating Well-Dispersed Representations of the Pareto Front for Multi-Criteria Optimization in Radiation Treatment Planning

A Proof of Principle: Multi-Modality Radiotherapy Optimization

A Multiobjective Approach for Sector Duration Optimization in Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatment Planning

A GPU-based multi-criteria optimization algorithm for HDR brachytherapy

Improving Observed Decisions Quality using Inverse Optimization: A Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Application

SU-F-T-342: Dosimetric Constraint Prediction Guided Automatic Mulit-Objective Optimization for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

Applying mixed-integer linear programming to the non-coplanar beam angle optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for liver cancer

RADIOTHERAPY BED MODEL MULTIOBJECTIVE PARETO-INTERIOR DUAL-OPTIMIZATION FOR PROSTATE CANCER HYPERFRACTIONATED TREATMENT PLANNING AND ISODOSELINES INVENTION

Beam Orientation Optimization for IMRT by a Hybrid Method of the Genetic Algorithm and the Simulated Dynamics.

Optimization of Isocenter Position for Multiple Brain Metastases Single-Isocenter Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Minimize Dosimetric Variations Due to Rotational Uncertainty.

Increased accuracy of planning tools for optimization of dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of radiotherapy through reformulated objective functions

A conjugate gradient-assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for fluence map optimization in radiotherapy treatment

Optimization of treatment isocenter location in single-isocenter LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for management of multiple brain metastases

Study on Optimization Algorithms for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Clinical necessity of multi-image based (4DMIB) optimization for targets affected by respiratory motion and treated with scanned particle therapy – A comprehensive review

Two Effective Heuristics for Beam Angle Optimization in Radiation Therapy