Abstract:We present a new method that simultaneously solves for cosmology and galaxy bias on non-linear scales. The method uses the halo model to analytically describe the (non-linear) matter distribution, and the conditional luminosity function (CLF) to specify the halo occupation statistics. For a given choice of cosmological parameters, this model can be used to predict the galaxy luminosity function, as well as the two-point correlation functions of galaxies, and the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal, both as a function of scale and luminosity. These observables have been reliably measured from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. In this paper, the first in a series, we present the detailed, analytical model, which we test against mock galaxy redshift surveys constructed from high-resolution numerical N-body simulations. We demonstrate that our model, which includes scale dependence of the halo bias and a proper treatment of halo exclusion, reproduces the three-dimensional galaxy-galaxy correlation and the galaxy-matter cross-correlation (which can be projected to predict the observables) with an accuracy better than 10 (in most cases 5) per cent. Ignoring either of these effects, as is often done, results in systematic errors that easily exceed 40 per cent on scales of similar to 1 h(-1) Mpc, where the data are typically most accurate. Finally, since the projected correlation functions of galaxies are never obtained by integrating the redshift-space correlation function along the line of sight out to infinity, simply because the data only cover a finite volume, they are still affected by residual redshift-space distortions (RRSDs). Ignoring these, as done in numerous studies in the past, results in systematic errors that easily exceed 20 per cent on large scales (r(p) greater than or similar to 10 h(-1) Mpc). We show that it is fairly straightforward to correct for these RRSDs, to an accuracy better than similar to 2 per cent, using a mildly modified version of the linear Kaiser formalism.

How accurate is our knowledge of galaxy bias?

How do uncertainties in galaxy formation physics impact field-level galaxy bias?

Linear and non-linear bias: predictions vs. measurements

Determine the galaxy bias factors on large scales using the bispectrum method

How does the cosmic large-scale structure bias the Hubble diagram?

What determines large scale galaxy clustering: halo mass or local density?

Galaxy Bias and Halo-Occupation Numbers from Large-Scale Clustering

How are galaxies assigned to halos? Searching for assembly bias in the SDSS galaxy clustering

An Analytical Model for the Non-Linear Redshift-Space Power Spectrum

CFHTLenS: Galaxy bias as function of scale, stellar mass, and colour. Conflicts with predictions by semi-analytic models

Cosmological Constraints from a Combination of Galaxy Clustering and Lensing – I. Theoretical Framework

Accurate Determination of Halo Velocity Bias in Simulations and Its Cosmological Implications

Dissecting and Modelling Galaxy Assembly Bias

A Simple Direct Empirical Observation of Systematic Bias of the Redshift as a Distance Indicator

Detecting Scale-Dependence of Bias from APM-BGC Galaxies

Galaxy bias in the era of LSST: perturbative bias expansions

Cosmic Census: Relative Distributions of Dark Matter, Galaxies and Diffuse Gas

Measuring Galaxy Bias from the High-Order Correlation Functions

Bias and scatter in the Hubble diagram from cosmological large-scale structure

Cosmological Constraints from a Combination of Galaxy Clustering and Lensing – III. Application to SDSS Data