Oblivious Collaboration

Yehuda Afek,Yakov Babichenko,Uriel Feige,Eli Gafni,Nati Linial,Benny Sudakov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1106.2065

2011-06-10

Abstract:Communication is a crucial ingredient in every kind of collaborative work. But what is the least possible amount of communication required for a given task? We formalize this question by introducing a new framework for distributed computation, called {\em oblivious protocols}. We investigate the power of this model by considering two concrete examples, the {\em musical chairs} task $MC(n,m)$ and the well-known {\em Renaming} problem. The $MC(n,m)$ game is played by $n$ players (processors) with $m$ chairs. Players can {\em occupy} chairs, and the game terminates as soon as each player occupies a unique chair. Thus we say that player $P$ is {\em in conflict} if some other player $Q$ is occupying the same chair, i.e., termination means there are no conflicts. By known results from distributed computing, if $m \le 2n-2$, no strategy of the players can guarantee termination. However, there is a protocol with $m = 2n-1$ chairs that always terminates. Here we consider an oblivious protocol where in every time step the only communication is this: an adversarial {\em scheduler} chooses an arbitrary nonempty set of players, and for each of them provides only one bit of information, specifying whether the player is currently in conflict or not. A player notified not to be in conflict halts and never changes its chair, whereas a player notified to be in conflict changes its chair according to its deterministic program. Remarkably, even with this minimal communication termination can be guaranteed with only $m=2n-1$ chairs. Likewise, we obtain an oblivious protocol for the Renaming problem whose name-space is small as that of the optimal nonoblivious distributed protocol. Other aspects suggest themselves, such as the efficiency (program length) of our protocols. We make substantial progress here as well, though many interesting questions remain open.

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in distributed computing, how much communication is minimally required to complete a specific task? Specifically, the authors introduce a new distributed computing framework - **oblivious protocols** (blind protocols), and explore how to use the least amount of communication to solve specific collaborative tasks under this model, especially two classic problems: "musical chairs" and "Renaming".

### Main contributions of the paper
1. **Introduction of the general oblivious model and its application to specific problems**: The paper defines a new distributed computing model and demonstrates its effectiveness in solving the "musical chairs" and "Renaming" problems.
2. **Proof that certain tasks are solvable in the read/write wait - free model but not in the oblivious model**: This shows that the oblivious model is a strictly weaker model.
3. **Determination of the minimum number of chairs required for the "musical chairs" task**:
- **Theorem 1**: There exists an oblivious MC(n,m) algorithm if and only if \( m \geq 2n - 1 \).
- For all \( N > n \), there exist \( N \) words, where each word is a permutation of \( m \) chairs, and any \( n \) words form an oblivious MC(n,2n - 1) algorithm.
4. **Similar results for the "Renaming" problem**:
- **Theorem 2**: There exists an oblivious Renaming(n,m) algorithm if and only if \( m \geq 2n - 1 \).
5. **Derivation of the lower bound of the number of chairs for the "musical chairs" task from the lower bound of the "Renaming" task**: This lower bound is derived from the read/write wait - free model.
6. **Study of the possibility of designing oblivious MC algorithms using random words**:
- **Theorem 3**: For every \( N \geq n \), almost every selection of \( N \) random words of length \( cn \log N \) (on an alphabet of \( m = 7n \) letters) forms an MC(n,m) system, and each schedule terminates within \( O(n \log N) \) steps.
7. **Study of permutation - based oblivious MC algorithms**:
- **Theorem 4**: For every integer \( d \geq 1 \), there exist \( N = n^d \) permutations, each acting on \( m = cn \) symbols, such that any \( n \) permutations form an oblivious MC(n,m) algorithm.
- **Theorem 5**: For every integer \( d \geq 1 \), there exist explicitly constructed \( N = n^d \) permutations, each acting on \( m = O(d^2) \) symbols, such that any \( n \) permutations form an oblivious MC(n,m) algorithm.

### Paper structure
- **Part 1**: Introduction, which presents the research background and motivation.
- **Part 2**: Defines the oblivious model in detail and compares it with known distributed computing models.
- **Part 3**: Presents the formal definitions of the "musical chairs" and "Renaming" problems and shows how to solve these problems in the oblivious model.
- **Part 4**: Discusses the efficiency of the oblivious model and other related issues.
- **Part 5**: Provides several technical proofs and further research directions.

Through these contributions, the paper not only theoretically advances the understanding of distributed computing models but also provides for practical applications.