Abstract:We consider two-player stochastic games played on finite graphs with reachability objectives where the first player tries to ensure a target state to be visited almost-surely (i.e., with probability 1), or positively (i.e., with positive probability), no matter the strategy of the second player. We classify such games according to the information and the power of randomization available to the players. On the basis of information, the game can be one-sided with either (a) player 1, or (b) player 2 having partial observation (and the other player has perfect observation), or two-sided with (c) both players having partial observation. On the basis of randomization, the players (a) may not be allowed to use randomization (pure strategies), or (b) may choose a probability distribution over actions but the actual random choice is external and not visible to the player (actions invisible), or (c) may use full randomization. Our main results for pure strategies are as follows. (1) For one-sided games with player 1 having partial observation we show that (in contrast to full randomized strategies) belief-based (subset-construction based) strategies are not sufficient, and we present an exponential upper bound on memory both for almostsure and positive winning strategies; we show that the problem of deciding the existence of almost-sure and positive winning strategies for player 1 is EXPTIME-complete. (2) For one-sided games with player 2 having partial observation we show that non-elementary memory is both necessary and sufficient for both almost-sure and positive winning strategies. (3) We show that for the general (two-sided) case finite-memory strategies are sufficient for both positive and almost-sure winning, and at least non-elementary memory is required. We establish the equivalence of the almost-sure winning problems for pure strategies and for randomized strategies with actions invisible. Our equivalence result exhibits serious flaws in previous results of the literature: we show a non-elementary memory lower bound for almost-sure winning whereas an exponential upper bound was previously claimed.

An Exponential Lower Bound for the Latest Deterministic Strategy Iteration Algorithms

Universal Complexity Bounds Based on Value Iteration for Stochastic Mean Payoff Games and Entropy Games

Beyond Value Iteration for Parity Games: Strategy Iteration with Universal Trees

Deterministic Sub-exponential Algorithm for Discounted-sum Games with Unary Weights

A Generic Strategy Improvement Method for Simple Stochastic Games

Non-oblivious Strategy Improvement

An Objective Improvement Approach to Solving Discounted Payoff Games

Concurrent Stochastic Games with Stateful-discounted and Parity Objectives: Complexity and Algorithms

Solving irreducible stochastic mean-payoff games and entropy games by relative Krasnoselskii-Mann iteration

Strategy Complexity of Reachability in Countable Stochastic 2-Player Games

Efficient Strategy Iteration for Mean Payoff in Markov Decision Processes

Bounded-Memory Strategies in Partial-Information Games

Strategy Complexity of Büchi Objectives in Concurrent Stochastic Games

The Power of Counting Steps in Quantitative Games

Partial-Observation Stochastic Games: How to Win When Belief Fails

Games played by Exponential Weights Algorithms

Fast Last-Iterate Convergence of Learning in Games Requires Forgetful Algorithms

Finding and Certifying (Near-)Optimal Strategies in Black-Box Extensive-Form Games

Expectation in Stochastic Games with Prefix-independent Objectives

Efficient Stackelberg Strategies for Finitely Repeated Games