Tuning Near-Field Interactions Using the Bright and Dark States of a Quantum Dot

Eyal Shafran,Benjamin D. Mangum,Jordan M. Gerton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1102.2962

2011-02-15

Abstract:We demonstrate that the cycling between internal states of quantum dots during fluorescence blinking can be used to tune the near-field coupling with a sharp tip. In particular, the balance between tip-induced field enhancement and energy transfer depends explicitly on the intrinsic quantum yield of the quantum dot. Our measurements show that for internal states with low quantum yield, energy transfer is strongly suppressed in favor of field enhancement, and explicitly demonstrate that suppressed blinking of quantum dots near metal surfaces is due to fast energy transfer.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics,Optics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to use the bright and dark states of quantum dots (Quantum Dots, QDs) to tune the near - field interaction**, especially to adjust the near - field coupling between quantum dots and tip probes by controlling the change of the internal state of quantum dots. Specifically, the author explored the influence of different quantum yield (\( q_0 \)) states in the fluorescence blinking phenomenon of quantum dots on the near - field enhancement and quenching effects.

### Main problems:
1. **Tuning of near - field coupling**: Research on how to tune the near - field coupling between quantum dots and tip probes through different internal states of quantum dots (i.e., different quantum yields \( q_0 \)) to achieve the regulation of near - field enhancement and quenching effects.
2. **Inhibition mechanism of fluorescence blinking**: Explain why quantum dots adsorbed on the metal surface exhibit the phenomenon of fluorescence blinking inhibition, and verify whether this phenomenon is caused by rapid energy transfer.

### Specific objectives:
- **Understand the mechanism of near - field interaction**: Through experimental and theoretical models, understand how the near - field interaction between quantum dots and tip probes depends on the internal state of quantum dots (i.e., quantum yield \( q_0 \)).
- **Separate enhancement and quenching effects**: By analyzing the fluorescence signals in different quantum yield states, separate the contributions of near - field enhancement and quenching effects.
- **Verify the energy transfer mechanism**: Verify through experimental data that the fluorescence blinking inhibition of quantum dots when approaching the metal surface is caused by rapid energy transfer.

### Research background:
Near - field interaction refers to the strong coupling effect between nanostructure (such as tip probes) and luminophores (such as quantum dots), and this effect can significantly affect the optical properties of luminophores. For example, near - field enhancement can increase the excitation rate of luminophores, while the quenching effect will lead to the weakening of the fluorescence intensity of luminophores. These effects have important application values in nano - optics, microscopy techniques and surface - enhanced spectroscopy and other fields.

### Core findings of the paper:
- **The influence of quantum yield on near - field coupling**: Research shows that the quantum yield \( q_0 \) of quantum dots plays a key role in tuning near - field coupling. For the state of low quantum yield, energy transfer is strongly inhibited, and the field enhancement effect is dominant; while for the state of high quantum yield, the quenching effect is more obvious.
- **Inhibition of fluorescence blinking**: Experimental results show that when quantum dots are close to the metal surface, due to rapid energy transfer, the fluorescence blinking phenomenon is significantly inhibited. This is consistent with previous observations on the behavior of quantum dots on the metal surface.

Through these studies, the author not only revealed the complex near - field interaction mechanism between quantum dots and tip probes, but also provided new ideas for understanding and regulating optical phenomena at the nanoscale.

### Related formulas:
The key formulas mentioned in the paper include:

1. **Normalized fluorescence signal \( S_{\text{norm}}(z) \)**:
\[
S_{\text{norm}}(z) = \frac{q(z)}{q_0} \kappa(z) = \frac{\Gamma_r + \Gamma'_r(z)}{\Gamma_0 + \Gamma'(z)} \kappa(z)
\]
where:
- \( q(z) \) is the effective quantum yield including tip - induced correction,
- \( \Gamma_0=\Gamma_r + \Gamma_{nr} \) is the intrinsic fluorescence rate,
- \( \Gamma'(z)=\Gamma'_r(z) + \Gamma_{et}(z) \) is the tip - induced relaxation rate,
- \( \kappa(z)=\frac{I(z)}{I_0} \) is the far - field normalized excitation intensity.

2. **Simplified parametric form**:
\[
S_{\text{norm}}(z)=\frac{\alpha}{1 + q_0 \beta}
\]
where:
- \( \alpha(z)=\kappa(z) \left[