A sneak preview of proof theory of ordinals

Toshiyasu Arai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1102.0596

2011-02-03

Abstract:This talk is a sneak preview of the project, 'proof theory for theories of ordinals'. Background, aims, survey and furture works on the project are given. Subsystems of second order arithmetic are embedded in recursively large ordinals and then the latter are analysed. We scarcely touch upon proof theoretical matters.

Logic

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Proofs that Modify Proofs

Henry Towsner

2024-03-27

Abstract:In this paper we give an ordinal analysis of the theory of second order arithmetic. We do this by working with proof trees -- that is, "deductions" which may not be well-founded. Working in a suitable theory, we are able to represent functions on proof trees as yet further proof trees satisfying a suitable analog of well-foundedness. Iterating this process allows us to represent higher order functions as well: since functions on proof trees are just proof trees themselves, these functions can easily be extended to act on proof trees which are themselves understood as functions. The corresponding system of ordinals parallels this, using higher order collapsing function.

Logic
The behavior of higher proof theory I: Case $Σ^1_2$

Hanul Jeon

2024-06-06

Abstract:The current ordinal analysis provides the proof-theoretic ordinal of a theory, which calibrates the robustness of the $\Pi^1_1$-consequences of the theory. We can ask whether there is an ordinal characteristic capturing more complex consequences, and it turns out that we can define the $\Sigma^1_2$-proof-theoretic ordinal capturing the robustness of the $\Sigma^1_2$-consequences of a theory. In this paper, we study the behavior of $\Sigma^1_2$-proof-theoretic ordinal, and it turns out that $\Sigma^1_2$-proof-theoretic ordinal also follows an analogue of Walsh's characterization of proof-theoretic ordinal.

Logic
Unprovability in Mathematics: A First Course on Ordinal Analysis

Anton Freund

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.06258

2022-04-21

Abstract:These are the lecture notes of an introductory course on ordinal analysis. Our selection of topics is guided by the aim to give a complete and direct proof of a mathematical independence result: Kruskal's theorem for binary trees is unprovable in conservative extensions of Peano arithmetic (note that much stronger results of this type are due to Harvey Friedman). Concerning prerequisites, we assume a solid introduction to mathematical logic but no specialized knowledge of proof theory. The material in these notes is intended for 12 lectures and 6 exercise sessions of 90 minutes each.

Logic
Proof-theoretic strengths of the well-ordering principles

Toshiyasu Arai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-019-00689-4

2019-07-30

Archive for Mathematical Logic

Abstract:In this note the proof-theoretic ordinal of the well-ordering principle for the normal functions $\mathsf {g}$ on ordinals is shown to be equal to the least fixed point of $\mathsf {g}$. Moreover corrections to the previous paper (Arai in Arch Math Log 57:649–664, <a href="#CR3">2017</a>) are made.

mathematics,logic
Well-foundedness proof for $Π^{1}_{1}$-reflection

Toshiyasu Arai

2023-04-08

Abstract:In the lecture notes it is shown that an ordinal $\psi_{\Omega}(\varepsilon_{\mathbb{S}^{+}+1})$ is an upper bound for the proof-theoretic ordinal of a set theory ${\sf KP}\omega+(M\prec_{\Sigma_{1}}V)$. In this note we show that ${\sf KP}\omega+(M\prec_{\Sigma_{1}}V)$ proves the well-foundedness up to $\psi_{\Omega}(\omega_{n}(\mathbb{S}^{+}+1))$ for each $n$.

Logic
Admissible extensions of subtheories of second order arithmetic

Gerhard Jäger,Michael Rathjen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2024.103425

IF: 0.776

2024-03-30

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic

Abstract:In this paper we study admissible extensions of several theories T of reverse mathematics. The idea is that in such an extension the structure M=(N,S,∈) of the natural numbers and collection of sets of natural numbers S has to obey the axioms of T while simultaneously one also has a set-theoretic world with transfinite levels erected on top of M governed by the axioms of Kripke-Platek set theory, KP . In some respects, the admissible extension of T can be viewed as a proof-theoretic analog of Barwise's admissible cover of an arbitrary model of set theory; see [2] . However, by contrast, the admissible extension of T is usually not a conservative extension of T . Owing to the interplay of T and KP , either theory's axioms may force new sets of natural to exists which in turn may engender yet new sets of naturals on account of the axioms of the other. The paper discerns a general pattern though. It turns out that for many familiar theories T , the second order part of the admissible cover of T equates to T augmented by transfinite induction over all initial segments of the Bachmann-Howard ordinal. Technically, the paper uses a novel type of ordinal analysis, expanding that for KP to the higher set-theoretic universe while at the same time treating the world of subsets of N as an unanalyzed class-sized urelement structure. Among the systems of reverse mathematics, for which we determine the admissible extension, are Π11-CA0 and ATR0 as well as the theory of bar induction, BI .

mathematics, applied,logic
Reflection ranks via infinitary derivations

James Walsh

2024-04-29

Abstract:There is no infinite sequence of $\Pi^1_1$-sound extensions of $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ each of which proves $\Pi^1_1$-reflection of the next. This engenders a well-founded ``reflection ranking'' of $\Pi^1_1$-sound extensions of $\mathsf{ACA}_0$. For any $\Pi^1_1$-sound theory $T$ extending $\mathsf{ACA}^+_0$, the reflection rank of $T$ equals the proof-theoretic ordinal of $T$. This provides an alternative characterization of the notion of ``proof-theoretic ordinal,'' which is one of the central concepts of proof theory. In this note we provide an alternative proof of this theorem using cut-elimination for infinitary derivations.

Logic
The monadic theory of order

Saharon Shelah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1971037

2023-05-02

Abstract:We deal with the monadic (second-order) theory of order. We prove all known results in a unified way, show a general way of reduction, prove more results and show the limitation on extending them. We prove (CH) that the monadic theory of the real order is undecidable. Our methods are model-theoretic, and we do not use automaton theory. This is a slightly corrected version of a very old work.

Logic
Formalising Ordinal Partition Relations Using Isabelle/HOL

Mirna Džamonja,Angeliki Koutsoukou-Argyraki,Lawrence C. Paulson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2021.1980464

2021-04-20

Abstract:This is an overview of a formalisation project in the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL of a number of research results in infinitary combinatorics and set theory (more specifically in ordinal partition relations) by Erdős--Milner, Specker, Larson and Nash-Williams, leading to Larson's proof of the unpublished result by E.C. Milner asserting that for all $m \in \mathbb{N}$, $\omega^\omega\arrows(\omega^\omega, m)$. This material has been recently formalised by Paulson and is available on the Archive of Formal Proofs; here we discuss some of the most challenging aspects of the formalisation process. This project is also a demonstration of working with Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory in higher-order logic.

Logic
Lectures on Ordinal Analysis

Toshiyasu Arai

2023-04-01

Abstract:This is a lecture notes for a mini-course in Department of Mathematics, Ghent University, 14 Mar.-25 Mar. 2023.

Logic,History and Overview
Constructive theory of ordinals

Thierry Coquand,Henri Lombardi,Stefan Neuwirth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811245220_0012

2024-12-10

Abstract:In Chapter 3 of his Notes on constructive mathematics, Martin-L{ö}f describes recursively constructed ordinals. He gives a constructively acceptable version of Kleene's computable ordinals. In fact, the Turing definition of computable functions is not needed from a constructive point of view. We give in this paper a constructive theory of ordinals that is similar to Martin-L{ö}f's theory, but based only on the two relations "$x \leq y$" and "$x < y$", i.e., without considering sequents whose intuitive meaning is a classical disjunction. In our setting, the operation "supremum of ordinals" plays an important rôle through its interactions with the relations "$x \leq y$" and "$x < y$". This allows us to approach as much as we may the notion of linear order when the property "$\alpha \leq \beta$ or $\beta \leq \alpha$" is provable only within classical logic. Our aim is to give a formal definition corresponding to intuition, and to prove that our constructive ordinals satisfy constructively all desirable properties. Note that by adding classical logic, we would recover the ordinals of usual classical mathematics, at the cost of a loss of computability for most statements given in the usual form.

Logic
Witnessing Flows in Arithmetic

Amirhossein Akbar Tabatabai

2024-04-17

Abstract:One of the elegant achievements in the history of proof theory is the characterization of the provably total recursive functions of an arithmetical theory by its proof-theoretic ordinal as a way to measure the time complexity of the functions. Unfortunately, the machinery is not sufficiently fine-grained to be applicable on the weak theories on the one hand and to capture the bounded functions with bounded definitions of strong theories, on the other. In this paper, we develop such a machinery to address the bounded theorems of both strong and weak theories of arithmetic. In the first part, we provide a refined version of ordinal analysis to capture the feasibly definable and bounded functions that are provably total in $\mathrm{PA}+\bigcup_{\beta \prec \alpha} \mathrm{TI}(\prec_{\beta})$, the extension of Peano arithmetic by transfinite induction up to the ordinals below $\alpha$. Roughly speaking, we identify the functions as the ones that are computable by a sequence of $\mathrm{PV}$-provable polynomial time modifications on an initial polynomial time value, where the computational steps are indexed by the ordinals below $\alpha$, decreasing by the modifications. In the second part, and choosing $l \leq k$, we use similar technique to capture the functions with bounded definitions in the theory $T^k_2$ (resp. $S^k_2$) as the functions computable by exponentially (resp. polynomially) long sequence of $\mathrm{PV}_{k-l+1}$-provable reductions between $l$-turn games starting with an explicit $\mathrm{PV}_{k-l+1}$-provable winning strategy for the first game.

Logic,Computational Complexity
Clarifying ordinals

Noah Schweber

2024-08-20

Abstract:We use forcing over admissible sets to show that, for every ordinal $\alpha$ in a club $C\subset\omega_1$, there are copies of $\alpha$ such that the isomorphism between them is not computable in the join of the complete $\Pi^1_1$ set relative to each copy separately. Assuming $\mathsf{V=L}$, this is close to optimal; on the other hand, assuming large cardinals the same (and more) holds for every projective functional.

Logic
A proof-theoretical approach to some extensions of first order quantification

Loïc Allègre,Ophélie Lacroix,Christian Retoré

2024-07-13

Abstract:Generalised quantifiers, which include Henkin's branching quantifiers, have been introduced by Mostowski and Lindström and developed as a substantial topic application of logic, especially model theory, to linguistics with work by Barwise, Cooper, Keenan. In this paper, we mainly study the proof theory of some non-standard quantifiers as second order formulae . Our first example is the usual pair of first order quantifiers (for all / there exists) when individuals are viewed as individual concepts handled by second order deductive rules. Our second example is the study of a second order translation of the simplest branching quantifier: ``A member of each team and a member of each board of directors know each other", for which we propose a second order treatment.

Logic,Logic in Computer Science
The Theory of Sets of Ordinals

Peter Koepke,Martin Koerwien

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0502265

2005-02-13

Logic

Abstract:We propose a natural theory SO axiomatizing the class of sets of ordinals in a model of ZFC set theory. Both theories possess equal logical strength. Constructibility theory in SO corresponds to a natural recursion theory on ordinals.
Universal Proof Theory, TACL 2022 Lecture Notes

Rosalie Iemhoff,Raheleh Jalali

2023-05-18

Abstract:The subject of these short lecture notes is a recently emerging area within proof theory, called \emph{Universal Proof Theory}. Here one is concerned with the existence and nonexistence of good (or useful or applicable or ...) proof systems.

Logic,Logic in Computer Science
Proofs for Free in the $λΠ$-Calculus Modulo Theory

Thomas Traversié

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.404.4

2024-07-09

Abstract:Parametricity allows the transfer of proofs between different implementations of the same data structure. The lambdaPi-calculus modulo theory is an extension of the lambda-calculus with dependent types and user-defined rewrite rules. It is a logical framework, used to exchange proofs between different proof systems. We define an interpretation of theories of the lambdaPi-calculus modulo theory, inspired by parametricity. Such an interpretation allows to transfer proofs for free between theories that feature the notions of proposition and proof, when the source theory can be embedded into the target theory.

Logic in Computer Science
Proofs as stateful programs: A first-order logic with abstract Hoare triples, and an interpretation into an imperative language

Thomas Powell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46298/lmcs-20%281%3A7%292024

2024-01-25

Abstract:We introduce an extension of first-order logic that comes equipped with additional predicates for reasoning about an abstract state. Sequents in the logic comprise a main formula together with pre- and postconditions in the style of Hoare logic, and the axioms and rules of the logic ensure that the assertions about the state compose in the correct way. The main result of the paper is a realizability interpretation of our logic that extracts programs into a mixed functional/imperative language. All programs expressible in this language act on the state in a sequential manner, and we make this intuition precise by interpreting them in a semantic metatheory using the state monad. Our basic framework is very general, and our intention is that it can be instantiated and extended in a variety of different ways. We outline in detail one such extension: A monadic version of Heyting arithmetic with a wellfounded while rule, and conclude by outlining several other directions for future work.

Logic in Computer Science,Logic

A sneak preview of proof theory of ordinals

Proofs that Modify Proofs

The behavior of higher proof theory I: Case $Σ^1_2$

Unprovability in Mathematics: A First Course on Ordinal Analysis

Proof-theoretic strengths of the well-ordering principles

Well-foundedness proof for $Π^{1}_{1}$-reflection

Admissible extensions of subtheories of second order arithmetic

Reflection ranks via infinitary derivations

The monadic theory of order

Formalising Ordinal Partition Relations Using Isabelle/HOL

Lectures on Ordinal Analysis

Constructive theory of ordinals

Witnessing Flows in Arithmetic

Clarifying ordinals

A proof-theoretical approach to some extensions of first order quantification

The Theory of Sets of Ordinals

Universal Proof Theory, TACL 2022 Lecture Notes

Proofs for Free in the $λΠ$-Calculus Modulo Theory

Proofs as stateful programs: A first-order logic with abstract Hoare triples, and an interpretation into an imperative language