Equilibrium and pre-equilibrium processes in the 55Mn(6Li,xp) and 57Fe(a,xp) reactions

A.V. Voinov,S.M. Grimes,C.R. Brune,A. Burger,A. Gorgen,M. Guttormsen,A.C. Larsen,T.N. Massey,S. Siem,C. Kalbach
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.054605
2011-01-21
Abstract:Spectra of outgoing neutrons and protons from the 6Li+55Mn reaction and protons from the a+57Fe reaction have been measured with beams of 15 MeV 6Li ions and 30 MeV alpha-particles. These reactions proceed through the same 61Ni nucleus at the same excitation energy, thus allowing the difference in reaction mechanism to be studied. It is shown that spectra from the first reaction measured at backward angles are due to emission from a traditional compound nucleus reaction, in which the intermediate nucleus has reached statistical equilibrium; the spectra from the second reaction contain a significant fraction of pre-equilibrium emission at all angles. Level density pa- rameters of the residual nucleus 60Co have been obtained from the first reaction. Both emission spectra and angular distributions have been measured for the second reaction. It was found that the pre-equilibrium component exhibits a forward-peaked angular distribution, as expected, but with a steeper slope than predicted and with an unusual slight rise at angles above 120°. The backward- angle rise is explained qualitatively by the dominance of the multi-step compound mechanism at backward angles.
Nuclear Experiment
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is understanding the pre-equilibrium mechanism in nuclear reactions, particularly the ratio of pre-equilibrium to equilibrium emissions under different reaction conditions. Specifically, the researchers investigate the different mechanisms of these reactions at the same excitation energy by measuring the energy spectra and angular distributions of protons and neutrons produced in two different nuclear reactions (\(^{55}\text{Mn}(\text{Li}^6, xp)\) and \(\text{Fe}^{57}(\alpha, xp)\)). ### Main Issues: 1. **Distinguishing Pre-equilibrium and Equilibrium Emissions**: How to distinguish pre-equilibrium emissions from equilibrium emissions in experimental data and determine their respective proportions. 2. **Differences in Reaction Mechanisms**: Why the two reactions exhibit different emission mechanisms at the same excitation energy. 3. **Validation of Theoretical Models**: How to use experimental data to validate existing theoretical models, particularly the pre-equilibrium model and the compound nucleus model. ### Specific Objectives: - **Measure Energy Spectra and Angular Distributions**: Experimentally measure the energy spectra and angular distributions of protons and neutrons produced in the two reactions. - **Determine Level Density Parameter**: Extract the level density parameter of the residual nucleus \(^{60}\text{Co}\) from the first reaction (\(^{55}\text{Mn}(\text{Li}^6, xp)\)). - **Compare Pre-equilibrium and Equilibrium Emissions**: Determine the proportion of pre-equilibrium emissions in the \(\text{Fe}^{57}(\alpha, xp)\) reaction by comparing the experimental data of the two reactions. - **Validate Theoretical Models**: Use experimental data to validate existing pre-equilibrium models and compound nucleus models, particularly the Kalbach angular distribution systematics. ### Research Background: - **Pre-equilibrium Mechanism**: The pre-equilibrium mechanism refers to the gradual redistribution of the incident particle's energy into multiple degrees of freedom of the nucleus until statistical equilibrium is reached. During this process, particles can be emitted at any stage, known as pre-equilibrium emissions. - **Equilibrium Mechanism**: The equilibrium mechanism refers to the particle emission process after the nuclear system has reached statistical equilibrium, commonly referred to as evaporation. - **Importance of Experimental Data**: There is currently a lack of detailed experimental data, especially double-differential cross-section data at backward angles, which limits the development of theories. ### Methods and Results: - **Experimental Setup**: Use a 15 MeV \(\text{Li}^6\) ion beam and a 30 MeV \(\alpha\) particle beam to measure the energy spectra and angular distributions of protons and neutrons in the two reactions. - **Data Analysis**: Perform calculations using the Hauser-Feshbach model and the exciton pre-equilibrium model, and compare them with the experimental data. - **Main Findings**: - The backward angle energy spectra of the first reaction (\(^{55}\text{Mn}(\text{Li}^6, xp)\)) are mainly composed of compound nucleus emissions (equilibrium emissions). - The energy spectra of the second reaction (\(\text{Fe}^{57}(\alpha, xp)\)) contain significant pre-equilibrium emission components at all angles. - The angular distribution of pre-equilibrium emissions shows a distinct forward peak at forward angles but exhibits an abnormal rise at backward angles, which is inconsistent with existing model predictions. ### Conclusion: - **Complexity of Pre-equilibrium Mechanism**: Pre-equilibrium emissions include not only multi-step direct (MSD) processes but also possibly multi-step compound (MSC) processes. - **Improvement of Theoretical Models**: Existing pre-equilibrium models need to be reconsidered, especially in their predictions of high-energy emissions and backward angles. - **Importance of Experimental Data**: Detailed and accurate experimental data are crucial for validating and improving theoretical models.