On determining London penetration depth from magnetic susceptibility measurements: Reply to Comment on 'Superconductivity of amorphous and crystalline Re–Lu films' (Teknowijoyo and Gulian 2024 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 37 035005)

Serafim Teknowijoyo,Armen Gulian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad8af1

2024-10-31

Superconductor Science and Technology

Abstract:Recently, in Teknowijoyo and Gulian (2024 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 37 035005) we introduced a new, rhenium–lutetium superconducting series (highest T c ≈ 7 K). In light of some other Re-based materials, our films are also a candidate to the time-reversal symmetry breaking family of superconductors. Both polycrystalline and amorphous materials in thin-film form have been reported, together with their basic properties, which include the estimates of the coherence length and London penetration length. In our original treatment, both of these quantities were deduced to be rather small ( ξ ( 0 ) , λ L ( 0 ) ∼ 5 nm) and the so-called Ginzburg–Landau parameter κ is about 0.9. The author of Comment brings in arguments in favor of the statement that the new material has κ ∼ 250 . We find that the discrepancy comes from the two-solution nature of the equation for λ L ( 0 ) . We agree with the Comment's author that the London penetration depth in our films is more likely in the order of 1 μm, which makes Re–Lu a high-κ superconductor. Future research in both thin films and single crystals may shed more light in the accurate determination of the characteristic lengths of this material.

physics, condensed matter, applied