Abstract:No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). 1. One important distinction we had to explain to authors was differentiating between the impact of a communication effort within a study and the impact of that study outside of academic contexts. Others have written about this as well (e.g., Smith, Citation 2018 ), noting as an example that a randomized controlled trial can have an impact on health outcomes but the impact of that research beyond the trial would likely be what most considered "impact." Also, unlike in the 100 th issue forum, which included impact ON health communication research, we tried to focus primarily impact beyond the original or initial research studies. 2. Two other important considerations. First, who documents impact is not specified because I am not sure it matters. You can document others' impact as well or better than you can document your own. Community partners are well situated to document impact in ways researchers might have a hard time writing up in a way that resonates with stakeholders. Second, defining "original research context" is also a challenge – but scholars should document impact more often than not and worry about the utility or quality of those documented impacts over time. For example, outside of the original research context could be a research context in another field. 3. This categorization is reasonable but completely subjective and ignores nuance and overlap of the many impressive activities reported. Still, such categorization streamlines the discussion of trends and observations across essays. 4. This conclusion mirrors that of the editors in their reply to the essays in the 100 th issue of the journal (Thompson et al., Citation 2010 ). In almost 15 years, due undoubtedly in the need for researchers to document their individual impact on the field rather than their impact beyond the field, the documentation of impact of research outside of the immediate research context has changed little among health communication researchers. In that commentary, the authors note the need to reframe what one considers scholarly activity to truly allow for more efforts to have an impact beyond one's own research – an important and thoughtful comment that unfortunately seems to be mostly a priority in writing rather than in practice for most scholars. 5. This concern is not unlike critiques of research studies where some theory/model is mostly unsupported by results, but authors suggest in the discussion that the important results are what supported the theory/model.

Words Matter: Reflective Science Communication and Tradeoffs in Environmental Health Research

From impact metrics and open science to communicating research: Journalists' awareness of academic controversies

Scientific communication and scientific literacy for the public perception of the importance of environmental quality for public health

Evaluating Epistemic Commitments and Science Communication Practice in Transdisciplinary Research

Sustainability communication: how to communicate an inconvenient truth in the era of scientific mistrust

Capably Communicating Science

[Risk communication of policy advising scientific organisations: a thematic outline using the example of the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment]

Strategic science communication as planned behavior: Understanding scientists’ willingness to choose specific tactics

Framing effects on sustainable behavior

Exploring subjective risk-benefit perception as an integral component in risk communication

Understanding scientists' communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture.

Reaching Science Skeptics: How Adaptive Framing of Climate Change Leads to Positive Responses Via Persuasion Knowledge and Perceived Behavioral Control

Communicating Study Design Trade-offs in Software Engineering

“Environmental Justice”: The Central Role of Research in Establishing a Credible Scientific Foundation for Informed Decision Making

Making science communication inclusive: an exploratory study of choices, challenges and change mechanisms in the United States from an emerging movement

Against Conventional Wisdom: when the Public, the Media, and Medical Practice Collide

The Pursuit of Positive Impacts: Translating Longitudinal Cancer Studies into Successful Health Communication Interventions

How research on communication can help to understand the management of natural resources and sustainability transformations: practices, concerns and new perspectives on environmental communication

Language Matters: Exploring Preferred Terms for Diverse Populations

Why language matters: insights and challenges in applying a social determination of health approach in a North-South collaborative research program

The Importance of Documenting the Impacts of Health Communication