Abstract:The rapid decline of species is an alarming issue that needs immediate attention. With this in mind, the Red List and Green List were introduced by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) to provide baseline information concerning the statuses of wildlife in their range. In this study, field and participatory surveys spanning two decades were combined to reassess priorities, threats, and risks for marine species in Balikpapan Bay, Indonesia. Briefly, 11 marine species were recorded, with a total of 561 geo-tagged records. The only difference between the field surveys and the respondent estimates was the projected number of individuals for each species. Although the diversity and evenness values were relatively high in the marine zone, they indicated stability within populations because the species were distributed uniformly. In contrast, the results of the InVEST HRA model indicated a greater risk from fishing (65.72%) and coastal development (54.68%) when approaching the interior of the river in the riverine zone. These human activities may have been responsible for the declining-absence of dugong populations from 2001–2019. Overall, the reality of this threat is severe and much more alarming than the dugong's 'vulnerable' status on the IUCN Red List. Although spatial planning enhances local and global species recoveries, the existing conservation strategies seem outdated. Revision is needed, and the pace could increase with proposals of regular monitoring. Timely modifications could be made with these strategies until satisfaction (i.e., species recovery) is reached at Balikpapan Bay, Indonesia.

Revisiting the actual diversity of vulnerable megafauna using spatial information