A survey on transparency in clinical work expectations and compensation factors: empowering women in neonatology

Christie J. Bruno,Megan M. Gray,Kristen T. Leeman,Kerri Z. Machut,Renate Savich,Cynthia Crabtree,Lindsay C. Johnston
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02054-7
2024-07-19
Journal of Perinatology
Abstract:Establishing transparency for benchmarking clinical workload and compensation in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (NPM) is essential. Current financial challenges prompted many centers to transition to a "funds flow" model which often emphasizes generation of clinical relative value units (RVU) over educational and scholarship activities by academic faculty [1]. RVU targets in NPM are often unrealistic, contributing to burnout and job dissatisfaction [2, 3]. Gender inequity remains a threat [4], as female neonatologists earn less than males [5] even though they encompass >70% of the NPM workforce [6]. Our goal was to obtain national data on university-based NPM women faculty compensation metrics, clinical hours and coverage models to establish a benchmark and empower female neonatologists during negotiations. A 24-question electronic survey was distributed to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Women in Neonatology (WiN) Group listserv. The survey is available as a supplemental file to this paper. Questions included clinical hourly and RVU expectations for full time employees (cFTE) and compensation benchmarks for baseline work, overtime, and back-up call. Data was consolidated so individual divisions were represented only once. Results are presented in numbers, percentages, and medians with interquartile range. Analysis was completed with STATA 17.0. Raw data for the paper are also available as a supplemental file.
pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?