Abstract:Financial risks related to climate change and biodiversity loss are currently being addressed in a largely siloed manner. Neglecting their interconnections, however, may lead to 'blind spots' and misestimations of systemic financial risk, potentially undermining progress on both climate finance policy and emerging policy on biodiversity-related financial risks (BRFR). In particular, the 'risk measurement–based' approach dominating climate finance policy, which is now being taken up to address BRFR, is poorly equipped to address the radical uncertainty that characterises both types of risks. Furthermore, many BRFR may materalise over a more immediate horizon than climate risks. In this paper, we examine how central banks and financial supervisors are approaching the topic of BRFR in relation to climate-related financial risk. We argue that policymakers should focus upon the broader concept of systemic environmental-financial risks to account for the interactions and trade-offs between both domains of biodiversity and climate change. Instead of seeking evidence of financial materiality before acting, focusing on how the financial system is actively facilitating direct drivers of environmental damage offers a way for financial policymakers to assess potential sources of such risks on the basis of information available today. In turn, policy interventions should aim to reduce harmful flows of finance that may lead to the crossing of dangerous ecological tipping points. Key policy insights Financial policymakers need to think beyond siloes, and act on a precautionary basis to manage climate- and biodiversity-related financial risks concurrently. Financial authorities, coordinating with relevant government departments, should define business activities that are most harmful to climate and biodiversity, especially those contributing to ecological tipping points, e.g. activities linked to tropical deforestation, which will damage both domains. To aid transparency and supervisory risk assessment, financial supervisors could require the mandatory disclosure of portfolio composition, risk management, and due diligence procedures relating to the financing of identified harmful activities. Financial regulators could use their toolkits to discourage the financing of such activities, e.g. by applying punitive capital requirements. This approach may require greater coordination between central banks and other government departments to maintain democratic legitimacy and support existing central bank mandates.

Central banks and climate risks: Where we are and where we are going?

Climate change and central banks: what role for monetary policy?

Climate Change in the Discourse of Central Banks. Influence on Financial Stability at the European Level

Let's Talk About the Weather: The Impact of Climate Change on Central Banks

Central banks, financial stability and policy coordination in the age of climate uncertainty: a three-layered analytical and operational framework

A Significance of Climate Risks for the financial Stability: What do Trends in Central Banks Communication Tell Us?

Disclosures of banks’ sustainability reports, climate change and central banks: An empirical analysis with unstructured data

Realising Central Banks’ Climate Ambitions Through Financial Stability Mandates

Climate and Environment Risks and Opportunities in the Banking Industry: The Role of Risk Management

Climate actions and macro-financial stability: The role of central banks

Measuring the Climate Risk Exposure of Financial Assets : Methodological Challenges and Central Bank Practices

Biodiversity loss and climate change interactions: financial stability implications for central banks and financial supervisors

Is There a Role for Central Banks in the Low-Carbon Transition? A Stock-Flow Consistent Modelling Approach

Reducing Climate Transition Risk in Central Banks’ Asset Purchasing Programs

Climate Change and the Financial System

The role of central banks in promoting Green finance

Analysing climate risk in the banking sector: To what extent should the onus be on banks to fund the ‘green deal’ while focusing on their own climate change and ESG risk profile?

Managing Financial Climate Risk in Banking Services: A Review of Current Practices and the Challenges Ahead

The effects of climate change‐related risks on banks: A literature review

Climate risks and financial stability: Evidence from the European financial system

Anticipating the Unforeseen and Expecting the Unexpected: Effectiveness of Macro-Prudential Policies in Curbing the Impact of Stranded Assets in the Banking Sector