Perception of Young European Otolaryngologists toward Transoral Robotic Surgery in Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery

Jerome R. Lechien,Abdul-Latif Hamdan,Nicolas Fakhry,Luigi A. Vaira,Giannicola Iannella,Isabelle M. Gengler,Justin Michel,Thomas Radulesco,Marc Remacle,Stephane Hans,Giovanni Cammaroto,Alberto M. Saibene,Miguel Mayo-Yanez,Antonino Maniaci
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113055
IF: 3.9
2024-05-24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background: To investigate the perception of young European otolaryngologists (OTOs), i.e., head and neck surgeons, toward transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Methods: Members of the Young Confederation of European Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Young Otolaryngologists of International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies were surveyed about TORS perception and practice. Results: The survey was completed by 120 young OTOS (26%). The most important barriers to TORS were robot availability (73%), cost (69%), and lack of training (37%). The participants believed that the main benefits include better surgical filed view (64%), shorter hospital stay (62%), and better postoperative outcomes (61%) than the conventional approach. Head and neck surgeons considered cT1-T2 oropharyngeal cancers (94%), resection of base of tongue for sleep apnea (86%), or primary unknown cancer (76%) as the most appropriate indications. A total of 67% of TORS surgeons assessed themselves as adequately trained in TORS. Conclusions: Young European OTOs report positive perception, adoption, and knowledge of TORS. The cost-related unavailability and the lack of training or access are reported to be the most important barriers for the spread of TORS.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?