Abstract:Background: Although trauma exposure is universally prevalent, the ways in which individuals respond to potentially traumatic events vary. Between-country differences have been identified as affecting the development and manifestation of transdiagnostic psychological symptoms, but it remains unclear how stress and trauma-related transdiagnostic symptoms and risk patterns differ based on geographic region. Objective: To explore whether there are distinct classes of stress and trauma-related transdiagnostic symptoms and to determine predictors of class membership in a global sample. Method: Participants ( N = 8675) from 115 different countries were recruited online between 2020–2022 and completed the Global Psychotrauma Screen, which assesses stress and trauma exposure, related symptoms, and risk factors. A latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify classes of stress and trauma-related symptoms per world region (African States, Asia-Pacific States, Eastern European States, Latin American and Caribbean States, Western European and Other States, and North America) and the total sample. Likelihood of class membership was assessed based on demographics, characteristics of the potentially traumatic event, and potential risk factors across the world regions. Results: Similar class compositions were observed across regions. A joint latent class analysis identified three classes that differed by symptom severity (i.e. high, moderate, low). Multinomial logistic regression analyses revealed several factors that conferred greater risk for experiencing higher levels of symptoms, including geographic region, gender, and lack of social support, among others. Conclusions: Stress and trauma-related symptoms seem to be similarly transdiagnostic across the world, supporting the value of a transdiagnostic assessment. Antecedentes: aunque la exposición al trauma es universalmente prevalente, las formas en que los individuos responden a eventos potencialmente traumáticos varían. Se ha identificado que las diferencias entre países afectan el desarrollo y la manifestación de los síntomas psicológicos transdiagnósticos, pero permanece sin esclarecer cómo los síntomas transdiagnósticos y patrones de riesgo relacionados con el estrés y el trauma difieren según la región geográfica. Objetivo: explorar si existen distintas clases de síntomas transdiagnósticos relacionados con el estrés y el trauma y determinar predictores de pertenencia a una clase en una muestra global. Método: Participantes ( N = 8.675) de 115 países diferentes fueron reclutados en línea entre 2020 y 2022 y completaron la Evaluación Global de Psicotrauma, que evalúa la exposición al estrés y al trauma, los síntomas relacionados y los factores de riesgo. Se utilizó un análisis de clases latentes (LCA) para identificar clases de síntomas relacionados con el estrés y el trauma por región del mundo (Estados de África, Estados de Asia y el Pacífico, Estados de Europa del Este, Estados de América Latina y el Caribe, Estados de Europa Occidental y otros, y América del Norte) y la muestra total. La probabilidad de pertenecer a una clase se evaluó en función de la demografía, las características del evento potencialmente traumático y los posibles factores de riesgo en todas las regiones del mundo. Resultados: Se observaron composiciones de clases similares en todas las regiones. Un análisis conjunto de clases latentes identificó tres clases que diferían según la gravedad de los síntomas (es decir, alta, moderada, baja). Los análisis de regresión logística multinomial revelaron varios factores que conferían un mayor riesgo de experimentar niveles más altos de síntomas, incluida la región geográfica, el género y la falta de apoyo social, entre otros. Conclusiones: Los síntomas relacionados con el estrés y el trauma parecen ser igualmente transdiagnósticos en todo el mundo, lo que respalda el valor de una evaluación transdiagnóstica.

Understanding trauma as contextualized adverse life events that threaten the individual: Commentary in response to Marx et al. (2024)

Moving forward with a culturally inclusive PTSD Criterion A: Commentary on Marx et al. (2023)

Refreshing, necessary exposure to the problem with exposure therapies for trauma: Commentary on Rubenstein et al. (2024).

The Middle-Out Approach to reconceptualizing, assessing, and analyzing traumatic stress reactions

Beyond exposure: A healthy broadening of posttraumatic stress disorder treatment options: Commentary on Rubenstein et al. (2024).

Dimensional approaches to studying, assessing, and treating traumatic stress: Introduction to the Special Section

Rethinking trauma‐related psychopathology in the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)

How is trauma a transdiagnostic risk factor? A biopsychosocial model of risk and protective mechanisms following childhood trauma

Patterns of social-affective responses to trauma exposure and their relation to psychopathology

Why do I have to suffer? Symptom management, views and experiences of persons with a CPTSD: a grounded theory approach

Taking a trauma and adversity perspective to climate change mental health

Trauma, attentional dysregulation, and the development of posttraumatic stress: An investigation of risk pathways

Developmental trauma: Conceptual framework, associated risks and comorbidities, and evaluation and treatment

Advancing trauma studies: A narrative literature review embracing a holistic perspective and critiquing traditional models

Introduction to the Special Issue: Disproportionate trauma, stress, and adversities as a pathway to health disparities among disenfranchised groups globally

The social psychology of responses to trauma: social identity pathways associated with divergent traumatic responses

A paradigm shift in the conceptualization of psychological trauma in the 20th century

Exploring transdiagnostic stress and trauma-related symptoms across the world: a latent class analysis

Phenomenological-Contextualism All the Way Down: An Existential and Ethical Perspective on Emotional Trauma

Psychological treatments for complex PTSD: A commentary on the clinical and empirical impasse dividing unimodal and phase-oriented therapy positions.

Hostile-helpless states of mind: A scoping review of risk factors, correlates, and consequences