Upcoding in medicare: where does it matter most?

Keith A. Joiner,Jianjing Lin,Juan Pantano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-023-00465-4

2024-01-04

Health Economics Review

Abstract:Upcoding in Medicare has been a topic of interest to economists and policy makers for nearly 40 years. While upcoding is generally understood as "billing for services at higher level of complexity than the service actually pro- vided or documented," it has a wide range of definitions within the literature. This is largely because the financial incentives across programs and aspects under the coding control of billing specialists and providers are different, and have evolved substantially over time, as has the published literature. Arguably, the primary importance of analyzing upcoding in different parts of Medicare is to inform policy makers on the magnitude of the process and to suggest approaches to mitigate the level of upcoding. Financial estimates for upcoding in traditional Medicare (Medicare Parts A and B), are highly variable, in part reflecting differences in methodology for each of the services covered. To resolve this variability, we used summaries of audit data from the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing program for the period 2010–2019. This program uses the same methodology across all forms of service in Medicare Parts A and B, allowing direct comparisons of upcoding magnitude. On average, upcoding for hospitalization under Part A represents 2.38 billion annually (or 2.43% of Part B annual expenditures). These numbers compare to the recent consistent estimates from multiple different entities putting upcoding in Medicare Part C at $10–15 billion annually (or approximately 2.8–4.2% of Part C annual expenditures). Upcoding for hospitalization under Medicare Part A is small, relative to overall upcoding expenditures.

economics,health policy & services

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the issue of upcoding in the United States Medicare program. Specifically, the paper aims to analyze the extent of upcoding in different parts of Medicare, including Part A and Part B, and propose mitigation measures. Upcoding generally refers to the practice where healthcare providers report higher complexity services than those actually provided to receive higher reimbursements.

The paper points out that the coding mechanisms and recording methods vary significantly across different parts of Medicare, making direct comparisons of upcoding between parts more challenging. By using audit data from the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) program, the researchers were able to quantify and compare the extent of upcoding from 2010 to 2019.

The paper also emphasizes that upcoding is not only a financial issue but also an important topic for policymakers to address, as incorrect coding can lead to substantial financial losses. For example, in Medicare Part A inpatient services, upcoding results in additional expenditures of approximately $656 million annually (0.53% of total expenditures), while in Medicare Part B physician services, this figure is $2.38 billion annually (2.43% of total expenditures). In contrast, upcoding in Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage) is estimated to be between $10 billion and $15 billion annually (approximately 2.8%-4.2% of total expenditures).

In summary, the paper attempts to provide policymakers with data support by systematically analyzing the upcoding situation in different parts of Medicare, to better understand and control this issue.