Abstract:With wide deployment of deep neural network (DNN) classifiers, there is great potential for harm from adversarial learning attacks. Recently, a special type of data poisoning (DP) attack, known as a backdoor (or Trojan), was proposed. These attacks do not seek to degrade classification accuracy, but rather to have the classifier learn to classify to a target class t∗ whenever the backdoor pattern is present in a test example originally from a source class s∗ . Launching backdoor attacks does not require knowledge of the classifier or its training process-only the ability to poison the training set with exemplars containing a backdoor pattern (labeled with the target class). Defenses against backdoors can be deployed before/during training, post-training, or at test time. Here, we address post-training detection in DNN image classifiers, seldom considered in existing works, wherein the defender does not have access to the poisoned training set, but only to the trained classifier itself, as well as to clean (unpoisoned) examples from the classification domain. This scenario is of great interest because e.g., a classifier may be the basis of a phone app that will be shared with many users. Detection may thus reveal a widespread attack. We propose a purely unsupervised anomaly detection (AD) defense against imperceptible backdoor attacks that: 1) detects whether the trained DNN has been backdoor-attacked; 2) infers the source and target classes in a detected attack; 3) estimates the backdoor pattern itself. Our AD approach involves learning (via suitable cost function minimization) the minimum size/norm perturbation (putative backdoor) required to induce the classifier to misclassify (most) examples from class s to class t , for all (s,t) pairs. Our hypothesis is that nonattacked pairs require large perturbations, while the attacked pair (s∗, t∗) requires much smaller ones. This is convincingly borne out experimentally. We identify a variety of plausible cost functions and devise a novel, robust hypothesis testing approach to perform detection inference. We test our approach, in comparison with the state-of-the-art methods, for several backdoor patterns, attack settings and mechanisms, and data sets and demonstrate its favorability. Our defense essentially requires setting a single hyperparameter (the detection threshold), which can e.g., be chosen to fix the system's false positive rate.

Detection of backdoor attacks using targeted universal adversarial perturbations for deep neural networks

ATTEQ-NN: Attention-based QoE-aware Evasive Backdoor Attacks.

Universal Soldier: Using Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Detecting Backdoor Attacks

Universal backdoor attack on deep neural networks for malware detection

AdvDoor: Adversarial Backdoor Attack of Deep Learning System

Universal Backdoor Attacks Detection via Adaptive Adversarial Probe

Can We Mitigate Backdoor Attack Using Adversarial Detection Methods?

Black-box Detection of Backdoor Attacks with Limited Information and Data

Untargeted Backdoor Attack Against Object Detection

Detection of Backdoors in Trained Classifiers Without Access to the Training Set

Escaping Backdoor Attack Detection of Deep Learning

An Adaptive Black-box Backdoor Detection Method for Deep Neural Networks

MM-BD: Post-Training Detection of Backdoor Attacks with Arbitrary Backdoor Pattern Types Using a Maximum Margin Statistic

Robust Backdoor Detection for Deep Learning via Topological Evolution Dynamics

Test-Time Backdoor Defense via Detecting and Repairing

Backdoor Mitigation by Correcting the Distribution of Neural Activations

Temporal-Distributed Backdoor Attack Against Video Based Action Recognition

Critical Path-Based Backdoor Detection for Deep Neural Networks

Backdoor Online Tracing With Evolving Graphs

Dynamic Backdoor Attacks Against Machine Learning Models