The Effect of Myopic Control between the Dual-Focus Contact Lenses and High-Concentration Atropine in an Asian Population

Chia-Yi Lee,Shun-Fa Yang,Yu-Ling Chang,Jing-Yang Huang,Ie-Bin Lian,Chao-Kai Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life14010118

2024-01-14

Life

Abstract:We aim to investigate the myopic control effect of high-concentration atropine (ATR) and dual-focus contact lenses (DFCLs). A retrospective cohort study was conducted. A total of 182 eyes in 91 individuals who used high-concentration ATR (0.125%) and another 70 eyes in 35 individuals who used DFCLs were enrolled in the ATR and DFCL groups, respectively. The primary outcomes were spherical equivalent refraction (SER) progression and axial length (AXL) elongation. The generalized estimate equation was utilized to yield the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of cycloplegic SER progression and AXL elongation between groups. According to the multivariable analysis, the change in cycloplegic SER progression was similar between the DFCL and ATR groups (aOR: 1.305, 95% CI: 0.247–2.515, p = 0.803). The DFCL group demonstrated a numerically higher rate of AXL elongation compared to the ATR group (aOR: 1.530, 95% CI: 0.980–1.894, p = 0.051). In the subgroup analysis, cycloplegic SER progression was insignificant between ATR and DFCL users in different subgroups (all p > 0.05). The DFCL patients with moderate astigmatism and high AXL (both p < 0.001) presented a high risk of AXL elongation. In conclusion, DFCL usage demonstrated similar myopic control of cycloplegic SER and AXL compared to high-concentration ATR, while DFCLs showed lower AXL control, mainly in patients with moderate astigmatism and high AXL.

biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore the effectiveness of high-concentration atropine (ATR) and dual-focus contact lenses (DFCLs) in controlling myopia progression in the Asian population. The study used a retrospective cohort study method to compare individuals using high-concentration atropine (0.125%) with those using dual-focus contact lenses in terms of spherical equivalent refraction (SER) progression and axial length (AXL) elongation.

Main findings include:
- After adjusting for confounding factors such as gender, age, and corrected vision, the progression of eyeglass prescription was similar between the dual-focus contact lens group and the high-concentration atropine group.
- The dual-focus contact lens group showed a numerically higher trend in axial length elongation, but it was not statistically significant.
- In specific subgroup analyses (e.g., patients with moderate astigmatism or higher axial length), individuals using dual-focus contact lenses had a higher risk of axial length elongation compared to those using high-concentration atropine.

In summary, the study shows that high-concentration atropine and dual-focus contact lenses have similar effects in controlling myopia progression, especially in terms of controlling eyeglass prescription progression. However, in certain specific populations, such as individuals with moderate astigmatism or higher initial axial length, dual-focus contact lenses may be less effective than high-concentration atropine. These findings provide clinicians with information on selecting appropriate myopia control strategies.