Abstract:When psychologists or practitioners evaluate a psychometric test or questionnaire, there are usually two main questions that they ask: " Is it reliable? " and " Is it valid? ". On both of these criteria, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) performs well. Reputable psychometric tools have been developed through years of rigorous research by the test publisher, and OPP makes these research findings available via the MBTI Step I Manual and the MBTI Step II Manual, of which all practitioners are given a copy upon qualification. Major findings are also published in data supplements that can be downloaded free online from In addition, there are many articles by independent researchers in established journals. Interested parties can find hundreds of these on a free searchable database published by CAPT: Mary and Isabel's Library Online (MILO), at www.capt.org/MILO. This document presents a few key examples. Reliability Reliability looks at whether a test or questionnaire gives consistent results, in particular investigating whether it is consistent over time (test–retest reliability), and whether the questions that measure each scale are consistent with each other (internal consistency reliability). By convention, a correlation of 0.7 is often taken as the minimum acceptable value for personality questionnaire scales. The following independent, peer-reviewed study confirms that the MBTI tool performs well on both of these measures: Capraro and Capraro, 2002: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Score Reliability Across Studies: a Meta-Analytic Reliability Generalization Study Link to study online The MBTI tool was submitted to a descriptive reliability generalisation (RG) analysis to characterise the variability of measurement error in MBTI scores across administrations. In general, the MBTI and its scales yielded scores with strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability estimates, although some variation was observed.

Reliability and validity of scores from the Singer-Loomis Type Deployment Inventory

Testing the bipolar assumption of Singer-Loomis Type Deployment Inventory for Korean adults using classification and multidimensional scaling

Recent assessments of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

Reliability and validity of the MBTI ® instrument

Validity and Reliability Evidence for Assessing Holland's Career Types

Measurement of the Type a Behavior Pattern by Self-Report Questionnaires: Several Perspectives on Validity

On the Validity of Forced Choice Scores Derived From the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model

An Alternative to the Dichotomous Interpretation of Jung's Psychological Functions: Developing More Sensitive Measurement Technology

Validation of the BFI-10-R: A New BFI Scale with Strong Structural and Construct Validity

Development of an Inconsistent Responding Scale for the Big Five Inventory-2

Reliability and validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in evaluations of chronic low back pain patients.

Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) Scores Generated From the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF Test Booklets

The relationship between life satisfaction, self-consciousness, and the Myers-Briggs type inventory dimensions

Validity Evidence for Off-the-Shelf Language-Based Personality Assessment Using Video Interviews: Convergent and Discriminant Relationships with Self and Observer Ratings

[Construction of Jung Psychological Types Scale]

Development and validation of the Self-Identity Inventory (SII): A multicultural identity development instrument.

Characteristics of the Test Norms 11 Reliability 12 Validity 14 Overall Quality of the MBTI 16 Personal Decision Regarding Use of the MBTI 17 KOLB LEARNING STYLE INVENTORY 19 Practical Features of the lest Administration

Psychometric evaluation of the Differentiation of Self Inventory for adolescents

The nomological validity of the Type A personality among employed adults.

Reliability and External Validity of Personality Test Scores: The Role of Person and Item Error.