Association of anaesthesia‐directed sedation with unplanned discharge to a nursing home following non‐ambulatory interventional radiology and endoscopic procedures: a retrospective cohort study*

Annika Eyth,Felix Borngaesser,Osamah M. Zmily,Maíra I. Rudolph,Ling Zhang,Vilma A. Joseph,Oleg V. Evgenov,Jason Oliveira,Nicholas Kolmel,Seena Dehkharghani,Irene Osborn,Michael E. Kiyatkin,Andrew D. Racine,Peter P. Semczuk,Shweta Garg,Karuna Wongtangman,Matthias Eikermann,Ibraheem M. Karaye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16497
IF: 12.893
2024-12-07
Anaesthesia
Abstract:Summary Introduction Interventional radiology procedures and endoscopies are performed commonly worldwide, often necessitating pharmacological sedation to optimise patient comfort. It is unclear to what extent non‐anaesthetists should provide procedural sedation. Methods We studied adult patients who previously lived independently and underwent a non‐ambulatory interventional radiology or gastroenterology procedure under anaesthetist‐directed or non‐anaesthetist‐directed sedation at a large healthcare network. The primary outcomes were postprocedural adverse discharge to a nursing home and postprocedural duration of hospital stay. Results Among 22,868 patients included, 15,168 (66.3%) and 7700 (33.7%) underwent anaesthetist‐directed sedation and non‐anaesthetist‐directed sedation, respectively. Of all patients receiving anaesthetist‐directed sedation, 9.2% experienced adverse discharge to a nursing home compared with 21.3% undergoing non‐anaesthetist‐directed sedation. Anaesthetist‐directed sedation was associated with reduced risk of adverse discharge to a nursing home (adjusted relative risk 0.54, 95%CI 0.45–0.63, p
anesthesiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?