Abstract:The continued increases in life expectancy with no obvious deceleration, the proliferation of centenarians and appearance of supercentarians (those aged 110 years and over) leave us in no doubt that the belief that life expectancy was limited to 85 years is now untenable. Although we may ask how long the limits to life can be pushed, the crucial question is whether the extra years gained year on year in life expectancy are healthy years. This paper begins by reviewing what was historically believed to be the theoretical relationships between life expectancy and healthy life expectancy. We debate how current knowledge of mortality rates in the old and oldest old, the trends in healthy life expectancy, and the gap between the genders shed light upon these theoretical models, discussing the fact that different models may exist in different cohorts of the same population. The paper closes with some speculations on how we might monitor the evolution of healthy life expectancy more closely, particularly in those countries still early on in the ageing transition. Background The debate about the relationship between life expectancy and healthy life expectancy and the move from simply considering the length of life to the quality of remaining life began over two decades ago, though the debate at that time was predominantly theoretical with little data to prove or disprove theories. As mortality rates at older ages were observed to be falling, three main theories emerged. Gruenberg (1977) predicted a pandemic of chronic diseases, or expansion of morbidity, through the progress in medical care extending the life of those with disease and disability as well as life expectancy increasing to the ages at which disease and disability are more likely. Fries (1980) on the other hand gave a more optimistic outlook, that through behaviour change and prevention, we could postpone the onset of disease and disability closer to the end of life: the compression of morbidity scenario. Central to this argument was the existence of the limit to life expectancy, then thought to be around 85 years. Manton (1982) proposed an intermediate view between these extremes of a dynamic equilibrium, where the prevalence of disability may increase as mortality falls, but the severity of disability is reduced. The dynamic equilibrium scenario points much more clearly to the crucial question of whether the extra years of life are good quality years or not and for the need to introduce a notion of severity. Disability is, at the same time, an indicator of the severity of morbid states and an indicator of the quality of years lived. The introduction of disability into models of health significantly clarified the relationships between disease and mortality leading to the partitioning of years of life into those with and without disability and to the development of health expectancy as a population health indicator to elucidate the three scenarios. This can be seen from Figure 1 (WHO, 2004) which distinguishes three elements: total survival, disability-free survival and survival without disabling chronic disease, leading to life expectancy (LE: area under the ‘mortality’ curve), disability-free life expectancy (DFLE: area under the ‘disability’ curve) and life expectancy without chronic disease (DisFLE: area under the ‘morbidity’ curve). The difference between LE and DFLE measures life expectancy with a disability, the difference between LE and DisFLE measures life expectancy with at least one chronic disease and the difference between DisFLE and DFLE measures life expectancy with at least one chronic disease but without disability.

Life expectancy as an indicator of environmental health

Social and environmental factors and life expectancy, infant mortality, and maternal mortality rates: Results of a cross-national comparison

Impacts from Economic Development and Environmental Factors on Life Expectancy: A Comparative Study Based on Data from Both Developed and Developing Countries from 2004 to 2016

A Specific Method of Quantitative Assessing the Environment Health Risk: Loss of Life Expectancy

How do economic, health, environmental and demographic factors affect life expectancy? – a novel attempt for developed and developing economies

Determinants of life expectancy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region

Effects of health expenditure, death rate, and infant mortality rate on life expectancy: A case study of the United States

Health care system efficiency and life expectancy: A 140-country study

Social and Economic Determinants of Life Expectancy at Birth in Eastern Europe

Energy Consumption, Energy Distribution, and Clean Energy Use Together Affect Life Expectancy

National Level Social Determinants of Health and Outcomes: Longitudinal Analysis of 27 Industrialized Countries

Global health inequality: analyses of life disparity and healthy life disparity

A Systematic Review of Sociodemographic, Macroeconomic, and Health Resources Factors on Life Expectancy

Life expectancy: what does it measure?

Is life expectancy higher in countries and territories with publicly funded health care? Global analysis of health care access and the social determinants of health

Changes In Life Expectancy From 2006 To 2015 In Suzhou, East China: Contributions Of Age- And Cause-Specific Mortality

New insights into the determinants of the total fertility rate, infant mortality rate and life expectancy

The relationship between increasing life expectancy and healthy life expectancy

Life expectancy and disparity: an international comparison of life table data

Estimating life expectancy adjusted by self-rated health status in the United States: national health interview survey linked to the mortality

An empirical assessment of the relationship between life expectancy at birth and carbon dioxide emissions in 27 European Union countries