Comparative Histopathologic Analysis of Inner Ear Damage in Meningitis: Otogenic Versus Meningogenic Routes

Artur K. Schuster,Nevra K. Yilmaz,Tomotaka Shimura,Sebahattin Cureoglu,Rafael da Costa Monsanto,Joel Lavinsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31759
IF: 2.97
2024-09-13
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:A comparative study distinguishing histopathologic patterns of inner ear changes between meningogenic and otogenic routes in meningitis cases. Otogenic cases displayed a higher prevalence of changes in the spiral ligament and signs of early ossification, whereas meningogenic cases associated with a higher degree of vestibular damage. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering the infection route and its implications in meningitis. Objective To distinguish the patterns of inner ear changes between meningogenic and otogenic routes in meningitis cases. Our hypothesis is that pinpointing distinct patterns linked to each route could aid in the development of diagnostic strategies and targeted therapies. Methods Temporal bones (TBs) from patients with a history of meningitis and histopathological evidence of labyrinthitis were divided into two groups (otogenic and meningogenic). Inner ear histopathological examination was performed to identify qualitative and semi‐quantitative changes. This assessment encompassed inflammation patterns, indications of early ossification, hair cell loss, and alterations in the lateral wall, round window membrane, cochlear aqueduct and vestibular aqueduct. Results Thirty‐six TBs were included in the study (otogenic, 21; meningogenic, 15). Generalized labyrinthitis was more common in otogenic cases (100% vs. 53%, p
medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?