Assessment of Reproductive Health Effects of Hazardous Waste 1

H. Kipen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074823379601200209

1996-03-01

Toxicology and Industrial Health

Abstract:Hazardous waste streams have multiple agents with known or suspected reproductive toxicity, including many agents with relatively strong documentation of human reproductive toxicity. Table 1 gives examples of several well known human reproductive toxins. Only five non-infectious agents (ionizing radiation, lead, organic mercury, PCBs, and vinyl chloride) are well documented to affect humans outside a workplace or medical therapeutic setting. For two of these, the demonstration occurred in fairly unique settings of high-dose ingestion (methylmercury at Minimata Bay, Japan, and PCB ingestion in Taiwan and Japan). However, complacency is not appropriate, because perhaps 10 common metals, 20 common pesticides, and ail equal number of organic solvents and other agents could be added to the table, depending on the level of stringency one requires to document an adverse human effect. Hundreds of additional drugs and chemicals also have positive animal bioassays or mutagenesis assays but no human observational data. Thus, depending on our perspective, we may be awash in reproductive toxicity (Table 2) or we are relatively safe, with no documented human evidence of mutagens affecting our germ cells, and the vast majority of reproductive adversity ascribed to infections (e.g., rubella, CMV), aging parents, and inherent errors of our genetic transmission system. Resolution of this dichotomy is beyond the scope of this review, and truth likely rests in between. This paper is a review of information on the amount of reproductive morbidity, general mechanisms of reproductive morbidity, and central role of exposure considerations in counselling patients and considering policy with respect to reproductive morbidity from hazardous waste. Exp,Rs.ure is an often overlooked key to any consideration of human health effects of hazardous agents, and failure to carefully consider it can lead to significant clinical and public health misjudgments.