Substituting Carbohydrate at Lunch for Added Protein Increases Fat Oxidation During Subsequent Exercise in Healthy Males

Tommy Slater,William J A Mode,Louise C Bonnard,Cian Sweeney,Mark P Funnell,Harry A Smith,John Hough,Ruth M James,Ian Varley,Craig Sale,James A Betts,Lewis J James,David J Clayton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae237
2024-04-13
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Abstract:Abstract Context How pre-exercise meal composition influences metabolic and health responses to exercise later in the day is currently unclear. Objective Examine the effects of substituting carbohydrate for protein at lunch on subsequent exercise metabolism, appetite, and energy intake. Methods Twelve healthy males completed 3 trials in randomized, counterbalanced order. Following a standardized breakfast (779 ± 66 kcal; ∼08:15), participants consumed a lunch (1186 ± 140 kcal; ∼13:15) containing either 0.2 g·kg−1 carbohydrate and ∼2 g·kg−1 protein (LO-CARB), or 2 g·kg−1 carbohydrate and ∼0.4 g·kg−1 protein (HI-CARB), or they fasted (FAST). Participants later cycled at ∼60% V̇O2peak for 1 hour (∼16:15) and post-exercise ad libitum energy intake was measured (∼18:30). Substrate oxidation, subjective appetite, and plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), peptide YY (PYY), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and acylated ghrelin were measured for 5 hours post-lunch. Results Fat oxidation was greater during FAST (+11.66 ± 6.63 g) and LO-CARB (+8.00 ± 3.83 g) than HI-CARB (P < .001), with FAST greater than LO-CARB (+3.67 ± 5.07 g; P < .05). NEFA were lowest in HI-CARB and highest in FAST, with insulin demonstrating the inverse response (all P < .01). PYY and GLP-1 demonstrated a stepwise pattern, with LO-CARB greatest and FAST lowest (all P < .01). Acylated ghrelin was lower during HI-CARB and LO-CARB vs FAST (P < .01). Energy intake in LO-CARB was lower than FAST (−383 ± 233 kcal; P < .001) and HI-CARB (−313 ± 284 kcal; P < .001). Conclusion Substituting carbohydrate for protein in a pre-exercise lunch increased fat oxidation, suppressed subjective and hormonal appetite, and reduced post-exercise energy intake.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the effects of different ratios of carbohydrates and proteins in lunch on fat oxidation, appetite, and energy intake during subsequent exercise in the afternoon. The specific objectives of the study include: 1. **Investigating the impact of replacing part of the carbohydrates with protein in lunch on subsequent exercise metabolism (especially fat oxidation)**. 2. **Evaluating the effect of this dietary adjustment on appetite perception and post-meal energy intake**. The study design included three different lunch schemes: - **Low-Carbohydrate High-Protein Lunch (LO-CARB)**: Containing 0.2 grams of carbohydrates and approximately 2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight. - **High-Carbohydrate Low-Protein Lunch (HI-CARB)**: Containing 2 grams of carbohydrates and approximately 0.4 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight. - **Fasting Group (FAST)**: Lunch fasting. All participants underwent these three lunch schemes after a standardized breakfast and performed one hour of cycling exercise several hours later. The study evaluated the effects of different lunch combinations by measuring fat oxidation rate during exercise, subjective appetite perception, hormone concentrations in the blood (such as insulin, non-esterified fatty acids, etc.), and energy intake after exercise. The main findings indicate: - **Fat Oxidation**: Fat oxidation during exercise was higher under the FAST and LO-CARB conditions compared to the HI-CARB condition. - **Appetite Suppression**: The LO-CARB lunch better suppressed subjective and hormonal levels of appetite compared to the HI-CARB lunch. - **Reduced Energy Intake**: Energy intake at dinner after the LO-CARB lunch was significantly lower than under the FAST and HI-CARB conditions. In summary, the study aims to understand whether altering the ratio of carbohydrates and proteins in lunch can promote fat oxidation, suppress appetite, and reduce energy intake after exercise.