Deciphering lipoprotein(a) atherogenicity with use of high-throughput proteomics
J Morze,N A Marston,G E M Melloni,G R Da Silva,A Rynkiewicz,C Wittenbecher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2756
IF: 39.3
2024-10-29
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Background Accumulating observational and genetic evidence suggests that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], is significantly more atherogenic than other apolipoprotein-B containing particles. Systemic inflammation is thought to mediate the atherogenic effects of Lp(a). Previous studies have predominantly focused on single inflammatory biomarkers, an approach that fails to capture the broader molecular response to elevated Lp(a) levels. Purpose The aim of this study was to derive a proteome-wide signature of plasma Lp(a) concentrations and subsequently identify the pathways through which Lp(a) influences the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods This study included 41,123 UK Biobank participants with baseline Lp(a) measurements who also underwent a proteomic assessment. Relative concentration of 2,920 proteins was quantified in EDTA plasma samples using a high-throughput proximity extension assay. Lp(a)-associated proteins were identified in linear regression models, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, race, smoking status, estimated glomerular filtration rate, medication use, and apolipoprotein B. Proteins linked with Lp(a) concentration were then evaluated for their association with incident CAD risk using Cox proportional hazards models. Significant traits were further included in pathway enrichment analysis. Results Out of 2,920 analyzed proteins (Figure 1), 140 showed a positive association with Lp(a) concentration, while 336 exhibited a negative association after adjustment for multiple testing (False discovery rate < 0.05). The strongest positive associations were observed for apolipoprotein F, group 10 secretory phospholipase A, and C4b-binding protein beta chain. The strongest negative associations were observed for asporin, aminoacylase-1, and retinol-binding protein 5. Among 140 proteins positively associated with Lp(a), 49 were associated with an increased risk of CAD. Conversely, among the 336 proteins negatively associated with Lp(a), 10 were associated with a decreased risk of CAD. Pathway enrichment analysis (Figure 2) indicated that proteins linked with both Lp(a) levels and CAD risk predominantly upregulated pathways related to peptide-ligand receptor signalling, platelet degranulation, neutrophil degranulation, and cytosolic calcium response. Conversely, pathways related to HDL remodeling, PI3K/AKT, KIT, and nuclear receptor signalling were downregulated. Conclusions The greater atherogenic potential of Lp(a) may be attributable to the modulation of several molecular pathways, particularly those involving platelet and neutrophil responses, cell signalling, and lipoprotein metabolism.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems