Abstract:Adugna Kassie Tsehay, 1 Helmneh Mazengia Sineshaw, 2 Kirubel Eshetu, 3 Addisu Gize, 4 Samuel Ayele Abebe, 5 Adane Mihret, 6 Kassu Desta Tullu 7 1 Laboratory Directorate, Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2 Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA; 3 Diagnostics Team, Management Sciences for Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 4 Department of Microbiology, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 5 Data Management and Biostatistics, Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 6 Bacterial and Viral Diseases, Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 7 Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Correspondence: Adugna Kassie Tsehay, Email Background: Laboratory test results are the cornerstone for patient diagnosis and treatment. Gram staining is a classic laboratory test method used to differentiate between bacteria. Competence assessment can help identify gaps and provide suggestions to academics, researchers, and policymakers to address competency gaps. In Ethiopia, there is no evidence of competency assessment by medical laboratory professionals using the Gram-staining technique. Objective: To assess the competency of medical laboratory professionals on Gram stain examination and interpretation in selected hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the competency of medical laboratory professionals on Gram stain examination and interpretation from September 2015 to December 2017. Results: Of 190 participants, 55 (28.9%) participants scored low knowledge, 131 (68.9%) scored medium knowledge, and only 4 (2.1%) respondents scored high knowledge. From the study variables, education level, supervision by regional or federal government bodies, and training about Gram staining were significantly associated with the knowledge level of study participants. Forty eight (25.3%), 78 (41%), and 64 (33.7%) participants scored low, medium, and high skill level, respectively, from a total of 190 participants. From skill level analysis, hospital type, microscope type, and availability of health information resources were significantly associated with skill levels. There were 44 observations (4%) with major errors and 321 observations (28%) with very major errors from all 1140 observations. Of all observations, 321 (28.2%) reported without grading, 39 observations (3.4%) reported gram-positive bacteria as gram-negative bacteria, and 15 observations (1.4%) reported gram-negative bacteria as gram-positive bacteria. Conclusion: The current study found that most medical laboratory professionals work without supervision or refresher training in Gram stain examination and interpretation. Hence, medical laboratory professionals' knowledge and skill levels are unsatisfactory. Regular competence assessments, training, and follow-up are necessary to improve the professional competence in medical laboratories. Keywords: knowledge, skill, competence, gram stain and medical laboratory professionals Laboratory tests are the cornerstone of patient diagnosis and treatment. 1 Gram staining is one of the oldest laboratory methods that is still actively used to differentiate bacteria into two possible classifications: gram-positive cells, in which the primary stain is retained; and gram-negative cells, in which the primary stain is lost. 2–4 Gram staining is routinely used as requested for clinical specimens submitted for smear and culture. It is used to characterize any specimen. 5–7 Gram staining provides immediate information regarding the presence or absence of bacterial infection and the morphotypes of the bacteria involved in the infection. This can be the baseline for treatment initiation and initial choice of antibiotic therapy. 8,9 In Ethiopia, most medical laboratories in healthcare facilities cannot create microbial cultures to diagnose microbial infections. This is because of a lack of skilled manpower, infrastructure, cost of culture diagnostic materials, and other issues. 10 Hence, Gram staining is the method of choice for the detection of microorganisms in most healthcare facilities, as microbial culture is impossible or not accessible in most of these facilities. Despite its importance, interpretation of Gram staining is difficult for medical laboratory professionals because such an interpretation requires multiple observations and judgment that comes with years of experience. 11 For Gram stain interpretation, -Abstract Truncated-

Gram staining with an automatic machine

Development of a standardized Gram stain procedure for bacteria and inflammatory cells using an automated staining instrument

Performance evaluation of machine-assisted interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures

Automation of slide staining for large tissue sections

Improvement of gram staining effect by ethanol pretreatment and quantization of staining image by unsupervised machine learning

Automated Interpretation of Blood Culture Gram Stains by Use of a Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Development Of Control System For Automatic Centrifugal Interpretoscope

Virtual Gram staining of label-free bacteria using darkfield microscopy and deep learning

Scanning Electron Microscope: A New Potential Tool to Replace Gram Staining for Microbe Identification in Blood Cultures

Towards automated detection, semi-quantification and identification of microbial growth in clinical bacteriology: A proof of concept

Competency Assessment on Gram Stain Examination and Interpretation Among Medical Laboratory Professionals Working in Selected Hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Development of a Machine learning image segmentation-based algorithm for the determination of the adequacy of Gram-stained sputum smear images

Stain-free Gram staining classification of pathogens <i>via</i> single-cell Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning

An automatic inspection and control method for a biological reagent production system with image processing techniques

Performance evaluation of Alfred60AST rapid susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures in the routine laboratory workflow

Rapid and robust bacterial species identification using hyperspectral microscopy and gram staining techniques

Low cost automated whole smear microscopy screening system for detection of acid fast bacilli

Comparison of Labsan Tricell-1000 and Dirui FUS-2000 automated urine analyzers with manual microscopy

Effectiveness of manual cleaning in a line of oral suspensions

Gram Typing: Gram‐Typing Using Conjugated Oligoelectrolytes (Adv. Funct. Mater. 42/2020)

Diagnostic accuracy of an automated microscope solution (miLab™) in detecting malaria parasites in symptomatic patients at point-of-care in Sudan: a case-control study