Abstract:For carbon capture and storage (CCS) to be a truly effective option in our efforts to mitigate climate change, it must be sustainable. That means that CCS must deliver consistent environmental and social benefits which exceed its costs of capital, energy and operation; it must be protective of the environment and human health over the long term; and it must be suitable for deployment on a significant scale. CCS is one of the more expensive and technically challenging carbon emissions abatement options available, and CCS must first and foremost be considered in the context of the other things that can be done to reduce emissions, as a part of an overall optimally efficient, sustainable and economic mitigation plan. This elevates the analysis beyond a simple comparison of the cost per tonne of CO(2) abated--there are inherent tradeoffs with a range of other factors (such as water, NOx, SOx, biodiversity, energy, and human health and safety, among others) which must also be considered if we are to achieve truly sustainable mitigation. The full life-cycle cost of CCS must be considered in the context of the overall social, environmental and economic benefits which it creates, and the costs associated with environmental and social risks it presents. Such analysis reveals that all CCS is not created equal. There is a wide range of technological options available which can be used in a variety of industries and applications-indeed CCS is not applicable to every industry. Stationary fossil-fuel powered energy and large scale petroleum industry operations are two examples of industries which could benefit from CCS. Capturing and geo-sequestering CO(2) entrained in natural gas can be economic and sustainable at relatively low carbon prices, and in many jurisdictions makes financial sense for operators to deploy now, if suitable secure disposal reservoirs are available close by. Retrofitting existing coal-fired power plants, however, is more expensive and technically challenging, and the economic sustainability of post-combustion capture retrofit needs to be compared on a portfolio basis to the relative overall net benefit of CCS on new-build plants, where energy efficiency can be optimised as a first step, and locations can be selected with sequestration sites in mind. Examples from the natural gas processing, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and coal-fired power generation sectors, illustrate that there is currently a wide range of financial costs for CCS, depending on how and where it is applied, but equally, environmental and social benefits of emissions reduction can be considerable. Some CCS applications are far more economic and sustainable than others. CCS must be considered in the context of the other things that a business can do to eliminate emissions, such as far-reaching efforts to improve energy efficiency.

Carbon Capture and Storage – Legal and Policy Considerations for Sustainable Energy Solutions

Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology and Some Suggestions

Economic perspectives and policy insights on carbon capture, storage, and utilization for sustainable development

Exploring the Feasibility and Viability of Carbon Capture and Utilization & Storage (CCUS) as a Key Solution to Mitigate Climate Change.

The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage

Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world

The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage in the Mitigation of Climate Change

Policy stagnation or reevaluation? Exploring the regulatory dimensions of carbon capture, utilisation and storage in Finland and the Baltic countries

An analytical framework for long term policy for commercial deployment and innovation in carbon capture and sequestration technology in the United States

A New Global Framework for Clean Energy Technology Deployment Under the Paris Agreement: The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage (Ccs) in a Future Global Carbon Market

A Technological Review of Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage (DACCS): Global Standing and Potential Application in Australia

Review of technological progress in carbon dioxide capture, storage, and utilization

An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies

Pore Space as a Resource: A Discussion of the Policy and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage

Progress in carbon dioxide capture, storage and monitoring in geological landform

Best practices and innovations in carbon capture and storage (CCS) for effective CO2 storage

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Policy for China: Implications from Some Representative Countries and Regions

CO2 Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Policy Trends in the European Union (EU) and Major European Countries

Exploring the Potential of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage in Baltic Sea Region Countries: A Review of CCUS Patents from 2000 to 2022

Carbon capture and storage in the USA: the role of US innovation leadership in climate-technology commercialization

Bioenergy with carbon capture, storage and utilization: Potential technologies to mitigate climate change