Abstract:Abstract Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is a widely used method for quantifying microRNA (miRNA) expression, but its accuracy depends on appropriate normalization. RT-qPCR is susceptible to technical variation from several sources, including sample collection and storage, miRNA quantity/quality, and extraction and amplification efficiencies. Normalization corrects for these factors, theoretically leaving behind only biological variation. With growing interest in miRNAs as biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of various cancers, analyses must be accurate and consistent. Primarily, the comparative Ct method is used, which compares the expression of miRNAs to a reference value. Unfortunately, there is a lack of consistency on what to use as a reference. A standard recommendation is the average of multiple, stable miRNAs referred to as endogenous controls (ECs). Currently, there are no known universally stable miRNAs. Therefore, ECs should be selected on a per-disease and per-sample type basis. Multiple algorithms exist to identify stable ECs, but few studies indicate what, if any, steps were taken to implement them correctly. Also, many studies have used non-ideal reference values such as small nuclear RNAs or a single miRNA. This lack of agreement on protocol often leads to difficulty comparing studies and may produce incorrect results. This work addresses these inconsistencies by making recommendations for the normalization of RT-qPCR miRNA expression. We compared 2 widely used methods for EC selection, NormFinder and GeNorm, and to show how normalization influences results we also used an unstable miRNA. Only miRNAs with expression in all samples were considered as potential ECs. GeNorm is sensitive to correlated genes. Therefore, for any pair or trio of correlated miRNAs 1 was kept. NormFinder performs optimally with 5-10 candidate genes; therefore, we tested the 10 miRNAs with the lowest coefficients of variation (CV). The top 3 stable miRNAs were selected from each algorithm to serve as ECs, and we used their average expression to normalize each sample. For the single miRNA, samples were scaled based on its value. We applied these methods to 3 independent datasets: First, plasma samples from a study on canine osteosarcoma (OSA), including pre-amputation (n=45), post-amputation (n=27), and healthy controls (n=21). Second, tissue samples from a study on canine OSA, including primary tumour (n=42) and lung metastases (n=12). Third, serum samples from a study on canine lymphoma included B-cell (n=24), T-cell (n=16), and healthy controls (n=14). For datasets 1 and 3, NormFinder provided a better reduction in gene-specific CV and a more favourable cumulative distribution of the CV. For dataset 2, there was less initial variability, but NormFinder still had slightly better results. Both algorithms had pros and cons, but NormFinder consistently provides a better reduction in sample variation across datasets. Citation Format: Heather Treleaven, Latasha Ludwig, Alicia Viloria-Petit, R. Darren Wood, Ayesha Ali, Geoffrey A. Wood. Comparison of normalization methods for RT-qPCR microRNA expression in cancer datasets [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2350.

A benchmark of RNA-seq data normalization methods for transcriptome mapping on human genome-scale metabolic networks

Effect of RNA-Seq data normalization on protein interactome mapping for Alzheimer's disease

A Systematic Comparison of Normalization Methods for Eqtl Analysis

Comparing the Normalization Methods for the Differential Analysis of Illumina High-Throughput RNA-Seq Data

Normalization of RNA-Seq data using adaptive trimmed mean with multi-reference

Gene length corrected trimmed mean of M-values (GeTMM) processing of RNA-seq data performs similarly in intersample analyses while improving intrasample comparisons

Comparison of the effectiveness of different normalization methods for metagenomic cross-study phenotype prediction under heterogeneity

Calculating RNA degradation rates using large-scale normalization in mouse embryonic stem cells

A multi-platform normalization method for meta-analysis of gene expression data

Generation and analysis of context-specific genome-scale metabolic models derived from single-cell RNA-Seq data

TPM, FPKM, or Normalized Counts? A Comparative Study of Quantification Measures for the Analysis of RNA-seq Data from the NCI Patient-Derived Models Repository

Evaluating Cross-Platform Normalization Methods for Integrated Microarray and RNA-seq Data Analysis

Abstract 2350: Comparison of normalization methods for RT-qPCR microRNA expression in cancer datasets

A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis

Effect of normalization methods on the performance of supervised learning algorithms applied to HTSeq-FPKM-UQ data sets: 7SK RNA expression as a predictor of survival in patients with colon adenocarcinoma

Depth Normalization of Small RNA Sequencing: Using Data and Biology to Select a Suitable Method

Evaluation of Normalization Methods for RNA-Seq Gene Expression Estimation

Comparison of normalization methods for differential gene expression analysis in RNA-Seq experiments

Evaluation of normalization methods for predicting quantitative phenotypes in metagenomic data analysis

Evaluation of Candidate Reference Genes for RT-qPCR Studies in Three Metabolism Related Tissues of Mice after Caloric Restriction