P18.36.A REGIONAL CENTRE EXPERIENCE OF LARGE PTV VOLUME PATIENT OUTCOMES WITH 40GY/15# RADIOTHERAPY FOR GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME (GBM)

K Streatfield,J Glendenning,A Davies,S L Forner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae144.352
2024-10-01
Neuro-Oncology
Abstract:Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) are aggressive proliferative tumours, which are often large at diagnosis such that radiotherapy unavoidably treats a large percentage of brain. The required expansion margins to create the Planning Target Volume (PTV) for radiotherapy treatment, can often lead to high volumes of normal brain included. In the 40Gy/15# regimen indicated for the older patient population, and younger patients with larger treatment volumes, we sought to evaluate the effect that this had on both treatment outcomes and ability to offer further treatment at progression. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective review of GBM patients of performance status 0-1, treated during 2018-2023, with 40Gy/15# ± chemotherapy at the Kent Oncology Centre. Patient demographics, histology and radiotherapy planning data, subsequent lines of treatment and survival outcomes from radiotherapy start date were extracted from the local oncology electronic system. Analysis was performed using Python and the Lifelines survival analysis library. RESULTS 58 patients fulfilled the selection criteria, with the average age of 68 (range 46-80). The Male/Female ratio was 1:1. The Median Overall Survival (mOS) for the entire population was 9.0 months and Progression Free Survival (PFS) 5.0 months. 43% of the patients received surgical intervention with biopsy only and 55% debulking. 33 (57%) of the patients were MGMT unmethylated. As a percentage of the total brain volume, mean PTV size was 27.0%, with the range of 5.1-50.4%. 20 (34%) of patients had a large PTV size, defined as ≥30% of the total brain volume. These patients had poorer mOS in comparison to smaller PTV patients, with mOS 5.0 vs 11.0 months. Similarly, PFS was 4.0 months vs 5.0 months. Within the cohort of larger PTV patients, MGMT methylation status did not influence mOS (5 months Methylated vs 4 months Unmethylated) and PFS (both groups 4 months). In the 3 patients with very large PTV sizes (>45%, compared to ≤45%) of total brain volume, mOS was 4.0 months vs 9.0 months, and PFS 3.0 months vs 5.0 months. Fitness to receive subsequent lines of treatment was used as a measure of functional status at progression following radiotherapy. Of the 31 patients in the entire cohort with progressive disease, 12 (39%) received 2nd line treatment. 28% of progressing patients with large PTV sizes went on to receive 2nd line treatment, compared to 38% of smaller PTV sizes. No patients with very large PTV sizes >45%, received 2nd line treatment. CONCLUSION Our study indicates that large volume radiotherapy treatments (≥30% of total brain volume) are associated with poorer disease control and survival outcomes. This includes a lower proportion in patients with the functional ability to receive 2nd line treatment. Evaluation in larger patient cohorts to verify these findings would assist to inform treatment discussions.
oncology,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?