Psychosocial and emotional impact of strabismus on Indian families

P. Gogate
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.62665
2010-05-01
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Abstract:We agree that the histopathological diagnosis is confirmatory in the diagnosis of uveal melanoma and not magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). But the radiological features of uveal melanoma observed on MRI with T1 and T2 weighted images are very characteristic i.e. hyperintense on T1 and hypointense on T2. Further we believe that to label MRI as a confusing radiological tool in an aid to diagnose uveal melanoma needs a series of false positive reports and not a single case report study as cited by the author. The role of MRI as an aid to the diagnosis of uveal melanoma cannot be overemphasized.[3-6]
What problem does this paper attempt to address?