Abstract:Abstract As a visual-based specialty, dermatology has the opportunity to use artificial intelligence (AI) to aid diagnosis and guide precision management of skin diseases. To employ effective and safe AI, algorithms should be trained and validated on data sets that are representative of patient demographics in clinical practice. In our recent systematic review of AI image analysis studies in inflammatory skin conditions, ethnicity and Fitzpatrick skin type were reported in only four (6%) and 10 (16%) of 64 included studies, respectively. A systematic review of skin cancer image data sets similarly demonstrated poor ethnicity and Fitzpatrick skin type reporting, and under-representation of darker skin types (Wen D, Khan SM, Xu AJ et al. Characteristics of publicly available skin cancer image datasets: a systematic review. Lancet Digit Health 2022;4:e64–e74). Such bias in image acquisition limits the accuracy of AI tools when applied to real-world populations. We aimed to assess the representation of ethnic groups in our AI research and understand barriers to participation. We established a prospective observational cohort study in a national specialized psoriasis service based in South London, which seeks to develop AI algorithms for image-based assessment of psoriasis severity. Participants have photographs of their skin taken (both self-taken on participants’ own devices and professionally acquired in a studio) for AI image analysis. Images are securely stored in an ethically-approved research database in accordance with UK General Data Protection Regulations. Willingness to participate and reasons for declining were recorded. Of 557 patients approached between September 2021 and December 2022, 151 (27.1%) declined to participate in the AI study. The mean (SD) age of those willing and declining to participate was 47.4 (16.6) and 50.7 (16.2) years, respectively. Of those willing to participate, 57.5% were male vs. 53.6% who declined. Twenty-five per cent (n = 77/308) of individuals of white ethnicity declined to participate vs. 32% (n = 20/63) Indian/Pakistan/Bangladeshi, 33% (n = 6/18) black/black British, 50% (n = 5/10) Chinese/Japanese/Korean/Indochinese and 50% (1/2) of mixed ethnicity. Common reasons for declining participation included a disinclination to have photos taken, psoriasis affecting intimate sites, time constraints, medical reasons (e.g. poor mobility) and concerns regarding data security. Ninety-eight of 406 individuals who were willing to participate met the study-specific inclusion criteria (e.g. plaque psoriasis, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index > 3) and were recruited. Of those recruited, 82% (n = 80) were of white ethnicity, 9% (n = 9) Indian/Pakistan/Bangladeshi and 8% (n = 8) were black/black British. Seventeen (17%) had Fitzpatrick skin type V/VI. These data highlight ethnic inequalities in participation of AI image-analysis research. Further dissection of barriers to participation may inform strategies for ensuring more diverse and representative datasets, to maximize the potential of AI in healthcare.

1182 Ethnic Diversity in Facial Image Databases – the State of Play for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

P28 Understanding ethnic inequality and barriers to participation in artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis research in dermatology

Representation of Racial Diversity on US Plastic Surgery Websites: A Cross-sectional Study: Racial Diversity on Plastic Surgery Websites

Racial Diversity of Patient Population Represented on United States Plastic Surgeons' Webpages

Representation of Racial Diversity on US Plastic Surgery Websites: A Cross-sectional Study

Artificial Intelligence Portrayals in Orthopaedic Surgery

Beyond the stereotypes: Artificial Intelligence image generation and diversity in anesthesiology

The Face of a Surgeon: An Analysis of Demographic Representation in Three Leading Artificial Intelligence Text-to-Image Generators

The impact of geographic, ethnic, and demographic dynamics on the perception of beauty

BT11 Artificial intelligence and ethnically diverse skin: potential, pitfalls and a model for reducing risk

From Selfies to Surgery: Unveiling Trends and Ethical Considerations in Facial Feminization on Instagram

From Filters to Scalpels-Understanding Perceptions of Facial Asymmetry: an AAFPRS Survey

Disparities in Dermatology AI Performance on a Diverse, Curated Clinical Image Set

Racial and Ethnic Representation in United States Plastic Surgery Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Gender and Ethnicity Bias of Text-to-Image Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging, Part 2: Analysis of DALL-E 3

#PRS: A Study of Plastic Surgery Trends With the Rise of Instagram

Demographic Reporting in Publicly Available Chest Radiograph Data Sets: Opportunities for Mitigating Sex and Racial Disparities in Deep Learning Models

Using artificial intelligence on dermatology conditions in Uganda: a case for diversity in training data sets for machine learning

Capitalizing on social media: An evaluation of the public's preferences for plastic surgery social media content

A survey of U.S. public perspectives on facial recognition technology and facial imaging data practices in health and research contexts

Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Cosmetic Surgery: A Study on Rhinoplasty, Facelifts, and Blepharoplasty Procedures