Abstract:Category: Other; Ankle Introduction/ Purpose: Recovery from orthopedic surgery requires a degree of both physical and mental resilience during recovery and rehabilitation. The brief resilience scale (BRS) is a validated and reliable 6-item screening tool that measures resilience as the ability to bounce back or recover from stress. BRS can provide unique and important information about patients coping with health-related stressors. To date, there is little evidence describing the use of BRS as a pre-operative benchmark to evaluate outcomes following foot and ankle orthopedic injuries and procedures. We aim to determine how patient resilience, as measured with BRS, may predict the impact of orthopedic conditions and recovery from foot and ankle surgery. Methods: All patients undergoing foot and ankle orthopedic surgery at a single institution were enrolled in U-COSMOS, a HIPAA-compliant, automated outcomes data repository. All patients undergoing surgery completed BRS pre-operatively. We used a BRS cutoff of =4 (high resilience, HR) to create three cohorts. Patients also completed a PROMIS Physical Function (PF) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT), PROMISE Pain Interference (PI) CAT, PROMISE Depression (D) CAT, and Global Health (GH) Short Form pre-operatively as well as 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24- months post-operatively, as applicable. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 180 days were included for analysis, and the longest available follow-up was used. Differences in outcomes between the three BRS groups were determined non-parametrically using a Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance. Results: A total of 586 patients were included for analysis, with an average follow-up of 389 days. The patients were categorized as low resilience (n=44), intermediate resilience (n=229), and high resilience (n=323). Patients in the high resilience cohort had significantly higher PF and lower PI and Depression scores both pre-operatively (p < 0.05 for all) and post-operatively (p < 0.001 for all). The greatest disparity was found in depression where low resilience patients were greater than 1 SD worse than high resilience patients (Figure 1). Similar trends are observed for physical and mental global health. In addition to having higher absolute baseline and follow-up scores, the change of PF and PI is also significantly higher for high resilience patients (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Patients with high pre-operative resilience demonstrate better pre-operative physical function and pain interference scores compared to lower resilience patients and show greater improvement at 12 months post-op. We also found that lower BRS scores are associated with decreased pre- and post-operative mental health outcomes, including PROMIS Depression. Further analysis of the role of BRS in pre-operative assessment will help guide shared treatment decision-making. Identifying interventions for patients with low resilience will likely lead to improve surgical outcomes.

72374 - Assessment of resilience and social support in the context of colorectal surgery

Surgical Recovery Through the Lens of Patients with Colorectal Disease: A Qualitative Study in an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Setting

The Importance of Patient Resilience on Outcomes Following Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Surgery

Perceived Provision of Perioperative Information and Care by Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study

Challenges and Elements Hindering the Adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Colorectal Surgery and Their Resolutions: A Systematic Review

Patients' perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols

Geriatric Assessment in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review

The older patient's experience of the healthcare chain and information when undergoing colorectal cancer surgery according to the enhanced recovery after surgery concept

Pre-Surgery Depression and Confidence to Manage Problems Predict Recovery Trajectories of Health and Wellbeing in the First Two Years following Colorectal Cancer: Results from the CREW Cohort Study

Assessment of pre-, peri-, and post-surgical practices for elective colorectal patients in a model 4 hospital in Ireland

Correlation between social support and psychological resilience levels in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a descriptive study

Abstracts of the World Congress of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Washington, DC, USA, May 9-12, 2015

Developing patient education to enhance recovery after colorectal surgery through action research: a qualitative study

Supportive interventions to improve physiological and psychological health outcomes among patients undergoing cystectomy: a systematic review

Implementation of the pre-operative rehabilitation recovery protocol and its effect on the quality of recovery after colorectal surgeries

Influence of preoperative life satisfaction on recovery and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery - a prospective pilot study

Is a care pathway for enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery environmentally responsible?

V1 Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) compliance in elective colorectal surgery: an international multicentre survey

The impact of bowel dysfunction on health-related quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review

Perioperative experiences and needs of patients who undergo colorectal cancer surgery and their family caregivers: a qualitative study

Improving Breast Surgery Outcomes Through Alternative Therapy: A Systematic Review