Assessment of Effectiveness of Nutritional Education Interventions for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tazeem Tazeem Akhtar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1324
2024-08-08
Abstract:Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an escalating public health issue with increasing incidence and prevalence. Patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) are particularly vulnerable to malnutrition, significantly impacting morbidity and mortality rates. Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nutritional education interventions for CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis, focusing on renal and nutritional outcomes compared to usual care. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2011 to December 2023 using databases such as CINAHL, PubMed, Science Direct, Academia, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies (QES) involving adult CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed, and inconsistencies were resolved by consensus. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist was used for quality assessment. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.4.1, employing a random-effects model to calculate pooled effect sizes for renal (eGFR, serum creatinine, serum urea) and nutritional outcomes (serum albumin, hemoglobin). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and the analysis was performed with SPSS version 25. Results: The analysis included nine RCTs and four QES, totaling 645 participants for RCTs and 202 for QES. The pooled effect sizes showed no statistically significant improvements in key biochemical markers. Changes in eGFR were -1.47 (95% CI: -4.04 to 1.10, p=0.26, I2=0%), serum creatinine 0.00 mg/dl (95% CI: -0.13 to 0.13, p=0.99, I2=0%), and serum urea -10.49 mg/dl (95% CI: -35.73 to 14.76, p=0.42, I2=80%). For nutritional outcomes, serum albumin levels changed by -0.07 g/L (95% CI: -0.24 to 0.10, p=0.44, I2=23%) and hemoglobin by 0.22 mg/dl (95% CI: -0.75 to 1.18, p=0.66, I2=77%). Notable improvements were observed when nurses and dietitians collaborated and involved patients in meal preparation. Conclusion: Nutritional education interventions favored the experimental group, although statistical significance was not achieved. Collaborative approaches involving nurses and dietitians and patient involvement in meal preparation showed potential benefits. This review highlights the importance of patient-centered, high-quality research to improve nutritional education for hemodialysis patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?