Material Dynamics of Nickel (oxy)Hydroxide As an Alcohol Oxidation Electrocatalyst

Tana Siboonruang,Colin Flynn Crago,Ashton M. Aleman,Isabela Ríos,Johanna Schröder,Thomas F. Jaramillo,Maureen H. Tang,Michaela Burke Stevens
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2024-01562973mtgabs
2024-08-09
ECS Meeting Abstracts
Abstract:Electrochemical alcohol oxidation is an attractive reaction for renewable-energy driven production of value-added chemicals, like precursors for acrylic (acrolein from glycerol) and nylon (adipic acid from cyclohexanol). Implementing selective, earth-abundant catalysts for alcohol oxidation can improve electrolyzer efficiency and economics. For example, replacing the energy intensive oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in CO 2 electrolyzers with alcohol oxidation can decrease operating voltage by about 0.85 V and reduce electricity requirements up to 53% while also reducing carbon emissions from chemical production. 1 Electrochemical alcohol oxidation catalyzed by as synthesized nickel oxyhydroxide (NiOOH) is hypothesized to proceed through two pathways, a chemical, redox pathway preferred by aldehydes (geminal diols in alkaline electrolyte), and a potential dependent pathway preferred by alcohols. 2 Many studies have focused on understanding reaction mechanisms and device performance, however, transition metal alcohol oxidation catalysts, such as NiOOH, are known to undergo reduction/oxidation, phase changes, and even dissolution in the same potential window as alcohol oxidation. 3 It is still unclear how these processes affect catalyst material stability and electrochemical performance. In this work, we probe the performance stability and material stability of Ni(OH) 2 for alcohol oxidation in alkaline media through electrochemical cycling and chronoamperometry. We use a rigorously Fe-free environment to mitigate performance impacts from Fe-contamination common in non-purified alkaline electrochemical studies. 4 We show that the rate of change of alcohol oxidation current density (mA cm -2 ) depends on reaction pathway (redox vs. potential dependent), alcohol concentration, and side chain structure. Using EC-MS and NMR, we also probe changes in performance in yield and selectivity by quantifying oxidation products, including oxygen gas. These changes in performance are correlated to material changes through monitoring dissolution with on-line ICP-MS. Furthermore, to disentangle the role of potential and reactant (e.g. alcohol or water) on stability, we elucidate oxidation state and local structural changes using in situ X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS). Insights from this rigorous model system are directly translatable to the broader goal of developing efficient, long-lasting catalysts for industrial deployment of electrochemical organic reactions powered by clean energy. References. Verma, Sumit, Shawn Lu, and Paul JA Kenis. Nature Energy 4.6 (2019): 466-474.2. Bender, Michael T., and Kyoung‐Shin Choi. ChemSusChem 15.13 (2022): e202200675. Klaus, Shannon, et al. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 119.13 (2015): 7243-7254 Wei, Lingze, et al. ACS Catalysis 13.7 (2023): 4272-4282.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?