Abstract:A widely accepted theory is challenged in this paper. Foreign firms’ pricing premium from listing in the US was considered as a result of better regulation and protection of minority shareholders of the listed companies. This paper raises another viewpoint that the regulation clauses may not have been implemented as well as people used to think. The information asymmetry between the US regulators and the overseas firms creates the possibility that illegal activities such as forging documents and faking financial reports may not be discovered in time, especially when listing is through a non-IPO way like reverse merger transactions. As a result, the de facto poorly performed foreign companies also have a chance to list in the US exchanges by exaggerating their business performance in balance sheets and profit from selling stocks to American investors in the secondary market as long as their improper behaviors are not perceived by the regulators before listing. Therefore in contrast to what the existing literature has assumed, there are two types of foreign firms traded on the NYSE, Nasdaq and Amex: good firms with growth opportunities and bad firms which cheat the investors. As investors realize the existence of the bad firms, the problem becomes similar to the market of lemons. Price of the foreign stocks from countries with more information asymmetry, poorer legal enforcement and corporate governance could go down and the cross-listing premium may disappear. This paper uses firm-level accounting data of the Chinese stocks listed in the US exchanges and listed in the four stock markets in mainland China to prove the above hypothesis. Cross-listing discount, instead of premium, is found. Tobin’s q premium from listing in the US has been decreasing from year 2006 when the Chinese firms’ accounting fraud was first reported and finally turned to be negative. The widely reported financial fraud of the US-listed Chinese firms after 2010 proves the correctness of the aforementioned two-type-firm theory. Accordingly, the US-listed Chinese firms with more information disclosure are higher valuated, including firms listed via IPO rather than reverse merger, firms from large Chinese cities with better legal enforcement and easier verification of information authenticity, and large firms which are covered by more analysts and media. As for the hypothesis that bad companies prefer exaggerating their performance in financial reports, the historical data does show that the already delisted companies reported a much higher 12-month trailing EPS before their delisting. Moreover, when there is less information asymmetry and more information disclosure, price of the US-listed Chinese stocks goes up.

Regulatory Challenges for Chinese Concept Stocks Listed in the U.S.

Solutions on the Problems Caused by China's Legal Scope of Securities

Investing in a Foreign Startup Company: Luckin Coffee Inc.

Motivation and Countermeasures of Financial Fraud in Listed Companies A Case Study of Luckin Coffee

US-Listed Chinese Firms in Credibility Crisis: Who Are They? Where Are They?

Principles and Economic Consequences Analysis of Short-Selling Mechanisms for Listed Companies from the Perspective of Information Disclosure: A Case Study of Luckin Coffee

Are Foreign Companies Listed in the US Really Worth More? Information Asymmetry and Cross-listing Discount of China Concepts Stocks

The Path of Least Resistance: How Strict Chinese Stock Market Regulation Incentivizes Chinese Companies to List in Foreign Stock Exchanges

From Wall Street to Hong Kong: The Value of Dual Listing for China Concept Stocks

The Analysis of Luckin Coffee's Accounting Scandal

The Causes, Consequences and Countermeasures of Financial Fraud Based on the Case of Luckin Coffee

Chinese companies on the US stock exchanges in the context of aggravation of Sino-American relations: the relationship of the national markets, delisting risks and possible scenarios

Luckin Coffee: A Study of the Reasons for Committing Financial Fraud and Solutions for Getting Out of a Financial Crisis

Analysis and Research on Short-selling Industry Chain based on Luckin Coffee Incident from the Perspective of Information Disclosure

Analysis of Financial Fraud Supervision of Listed Companies Based on Game Theory--Take Luckin Coffee as an Example

THE SPILLOVER OF THE COFFEE: MATERIAL MISSTATEMENTS AT (UN) LUCKIN COFFEE INC.

Analysis of Luckin Coffee Listed Financial Competitiveness

Short seller report and stock performance Empirical evidence from US-listed Chinese firms

Analysis of Luckin Coffee Based on Harvard Analytical Framework

A Study on the Reasons and Effects of the Second Listing of Chinese Concept Stocks Base on Alibaba

Corporate governance: five-factor theory-based financial fraud identification