Efficacy and safety of herbal medicines intervention for cachexia associated with cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Guoming Chen,Ning Wang,Ruifeng Yang,Yixuan Wu,Jiaming Liu,Zhiqiang Huang,Zhenyu Zhang,Yuxin Huang,Cheng Zhang,Yau‐Tuen Chan,Yibin Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.7956
IF: 6.388
2023-10-07
Phytotherapy Research
Abstract:As a worldwide public health issue, cancer‐induced cachexia can result in decreasing physical function and survival rate. However, the therapeutic effects of conventional approaches, including pharmacotherapy, exercise and nutritional intervention, are far from satisfactory. Herbal medicines (HMs), especially Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), are reported to effectively treat cachexia for centuries. The inclusion criteria of all participants in this study pointed to the diagnosis of cachexia, the trial group used herbal medicine (HM) in complementary and alternative medicine, etc. Twelve databases, including EMbase, PubMed, Web of science, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, CINAHLPlus, PsycINFO, AMED, China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Chongqing VIP (CQVIP) were retrieved from inception to March 28, 2022. We conducted the meta‐analysis utilizing RevMan 5.3. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to assess the adequacy of the sample size for the outcomes. We have registered the protocol and the registration number was CRD42022336446. A total of 66 studies were included, containing 3654 patients diagnosed with cancer cachexia, of which 1833 patients were assigned to the trial group and 1821 patients were treated in the control group. Outcomes cover the primary indicator KPS (RR = 1.84, 95%CI = [1.61, 2.09], p
pharmacology & pharmacy,chemistry, medicinal