Abstract:Introduction In emergency situations, airway management is often given priority over other treatment methods. The preferred technique for airway management of unconscious patients is endotracheal intubation, which has become the standard of care. Intubation of the trachea not only enables controlled ventilation even for extended periods and in any position but also allows for the removal of tracheal secretions. Supraglottic airways have several advantages over endotracheal intubation, including faster insertion, less need for neuromuscular blockade, and less hemodynamic instability. They can also be used as a bridge to intubation or as a rescue device when intubation fails or is contraindicated. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical study is to simulate a prehospital emergency/disaster scenario to evaluate and study the feasibility and effectiveness of the use of intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) for onsite airway management from 360 degrees around the patient's head as in such situations, there may be limited or no access behind the head of the victim. Such a scenario can be extrapolated to disaster conditions where the victims may be trapped under the rubble following a building collapse /earthquake or are trapped in a vehicular road traffic/ train accident. It may take substantial time for extrication and evacuation of such patients to a hospital and hence it may be life-saving to provide prompt and early onsite airway management from wherever access is possible around the victim. We believe that the provision of a steel handle integrated with the airway tube may provide an opportunity for successful insertion of the device from 360 degrees around the patient merely by suitably changing the way the handle is gripped, so as to allow a single-handed smooth arc-like movement of the device for insertion, irrespective of the position of the rescuer relative to the patient's head. Objectives Our objective is to study the ease and time of insertion of ILMA, the number of attempts for successful ILMA insertion, and oropharyngeal leak pressure attained from unconventional positions in a supine patient. Materials and methods This prospective, randomized, observer-blinded controlled trial included 90 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized using a chit and box system for group allocation. Groups were as follows: Group 1 (n=30) - Investigator standing on the back of the head of the patient (0°); Group 2 (n=30) - Investigator standing on the left side facing the patient (120°); Group 3 (n=30) - Investigator standing on the right side facing the patient (240°). Then ease and time of insertion of ILMA, number of attempts for successful ILMA insertion and oropharyngeal leak pressure were noted, and intergroup comparison was done. Conclusion ILMA has proved to be an effective ventilatory device and a suitable conduit for intubation in patients lying in the supine position from a conventional standard position standing behind the head of the patient, as well as non-conventional position, facing the patient at 120° or 240° from the standard position.

Abstract No.: ABS0125: Study of airway management in 50 COVID positive patients in ICU

Clinical Experience with Emergency Endotracheal Intubation in COVID-19 Patients in the Intensive Care Units: a Single-Centered, Retrospective, Descriptive Study.

Ease of Intubation with McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Incidence of Adverse Events During Tracheal Intubation in COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Emergency tracheal intubation in 202 patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: lessons learnt and international expert recommendations

Tracheal intubation in the critically ill patient

Airway management practices in Covid ICU during the first and second phase of Covid-19 pandemic: experience from a tertiary care hospital of Western Uttar Pradesh, India

Invasive Airway "Intubation" in COVID-19 Patients; Statistics, Causes, and Recommendations: A Review Article

Difficult airway in intensive care unit

Current practice pattern among anaesthesiologists for difficult airway management: A nationwide cross-sectional survey

Tracheal Intubation in the Critically Ill. Where We Came from and Where We Should Go

Anaesthesia Practice in the First Wave of the COVID-19 Outbreak in the United States: a Population-Based Cohort Study.

Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Airway Management and Blind Tracheal Intubation Through It From 360° Around a Supine Patient: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study in a Simulated Prehospital Emergency Scenario

Difficult tracheal intubation in critically ill

Open Surgical Tracheostomy in COVID 19 Patients and Their Outcomes During the Second Wave in India: Experience at a Tertiary Referral Centre

Impact of COVID-19-adapted guidelines using different airway management strategies on resuscitation quality in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest - a randomised manikin study

Tracheostomy in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients and follow-up: A parisian bicentric retrospective cohort

A safer and more practical tracheotomy in invasive mechanical ventilated patients with COVID-19: A quality improvement study

Expert Recommendations for Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Patients with Noval Coronavirus Disease 2019

[Indications and success rate of endotracheal emergency intubation in clinical acute and emergency medicine]

Need for tracheostomy in major head and neck ablative surgery: a paradigm shift during the COVID-19 pandemic

Emergent airway management outside of the operating room – a retrospective review of patient characteristics, complications and ICU stay