Abstract:The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage.

Advanced Techniques for Improving Model Robustness in Adversarial Machine Learning

Attack As Defense: Characterizing Adversarial Examples Using Robustness.

Improving Adversarial Robustness of 3D Point Cloud Classification Models

Robustness-Congruent Adversarial Training for Secure Machine Learning Model Updates

You Don't Need Robust Machine Learning to Manage Adversarial Attack Risks

Impact of Architectural Modifications on Deep Learning Adversarial Robustness

Improving Model Robustness Against Adversarial Examples with Redundant Fully Connected Layer.

Robust Image Classification: Defensive Strategies against FGSM and PGD Adversarial Attacks

Improving Machine Learning Robustness via Adversarial Training

A Survey on Model Robustness under Adversarial Example

Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks

Opportunities and Challenges in Deep Learning Adversarial Robustness: A Survey

Evaluating Adversarial Robustness: A Comparison Of FGSM, Carlini-Wagner Attacks, And The Role of Distillation as Defense Mechanism

Position: Towards Resilience Against Adversarial Examples

Understanding and Enhancing Robustness of Concept-Based Models

Holistic Adversarial Robustness of Deep Learning Models

Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

Adversarial Machine Learning for Cybersecurity and Computer Vision: Current Developments and Challenges

Learning More Robust Features with Adversarial Training

Towards Robustifying Image Classifiers against the Perils of Adversarial Attacks on Artificial Intelligence Systems