Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a transcript of a dialogue among literacy educators and researchers on the impact of generative aritficial intelligence (AI) in the field. In the spring of 2023, a lively conversation emerged on the National Council of Research on Language and Literacy (NCRLL)’s listserv. Stephanie initiated the conversation by sharing an op-ed she wrote for Atlanta Journal-Constitution about the rise of ChatGPT and similar generative AI platforms, moving beyond the general public’s concerns about student cheating and robot takeovers. NCRLL then convened a webinar of eight leading scholars in writing and literacies development, inspired by that listerv conversation and an organizational interest in promoting intergenerational collaboration among literacy scholars. Design/methodology/approach As former doctoral students of two of the panel participants, webinar facilitators Grace and Victoria positioned themselves primarily as learners about this topic and gathered questions from colleagues, P-16 practitioners and those outside the field of education to assess the concerns and wonderings that ChatGPT and generative AI have raised. The following webinar conversation was recorded on two different days due to scheduling conflicts. It has been merged and edited into one dialogue for coherence and convergence. Findings Panel participants raise a host of questions and issues that go beyond topics of ethics, morality and basic writing instruction. Furthermore, in dialogue with one another, they describe possibilities for meaningful pedagogy and critical literacy to ensure that generative AI is used for a socially just future for students. While the discussion addressed matters of pedagogy, definitions of literacy and the purpose of (literacy) education, other themes included a critique of capitalism; an interrogation of the systems of power and oppression involved in using generative AI; and the philosophical, ontological, ethical and practical life questions about being human. Originality/value This paper provides a glimpse into one of the first panel conversations about ChatGPT and generative AI in the field of literacy. Not only are the panel members respected scholars in the field, they are also former doctoral students and advisors of one another, thus positioning all involved as both learners and teachers of this new technology.

Inhuman Rhetoric: Generative AI and Crisis Communication

Social Risks in the Era of Generative AI

Calling BS on ChatGPT: Reflections on AI as a Communication Source

Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education

Student and Faculty Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Student Writing

Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?

The Impact of AI on Academic Research and Publishing

Public perception of generative AI on Twitter: an empirical study based on occupation and usage

Generative AI and science communication in the physical sciences

Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process

Generative Ai: potential and pitfalls

Generative AI Beyond the Hype—New Technologies in the Face of Organizing and Organizations

Generative AI and composing: an intergenerational conversation among literacy scholars

Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Creatively in the Classroom: Examples and Lessons Learned

Generative AI and generative education

Artificial intelligence in social work practice education. The potential use of Generative AI for learning

Poietic symbiosis or algorithmic subjugation: generative AI technology in marketing communications education

AI-Powered Curricula: Unpacking the Potential and Progress of Generative Technologies in Education

Editors' Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing

Exploring Students’ Generative AI-Assisted Writing Processes: Perceptions and Experiences from Native and Nonnative English Speakers