Abstract:Background: Rotator cuff repair techniques have evolved over time. The original techniques were open procedures, then surgeons adopted arthroscopic repair procedures with anchors and implants. Today, rotator cuff repair has evolved to be performed as an arthroscopic transosseous technique that is again performed without the use of anchors. Description: In this video, the 5 essential steps of arthroscopic transosseous repair will be demonstrated. (1) Position the patient in either the beach chair or lateral decubitus position. (2) Utilize 4-portal arthroscopy, which allows a consistent vantage point while having 3 other portals for instrumentation. (3) Perform just enough bursectomy to expose the rotator cuff. (4) Anatomically reduce the rotator cuff anatomy where possible. (5) Triple-load the transosseous tunnels with high-strength sutures in order to maximize the biomechanical strength of the repair. Alternatives: Alternative surgical techniques include open rotator cuff repair and single and double-row rotator cuff repair using anchors. Rationale: The goal of any rotator cuff repair is to anatomically restore the rotator cuff. The fundamental principles include a strong initial biomechanical fixation, cuff footprint anatomy restoration, and maximization of biological factors to promote healing of the rotator cuff. Rotator cuff repair was originally performed as an open procedure, which allows for direct visualization of the tear and repair; however, open repair requires some level of deltoid splitting, which can potentially affect postoperative early mobilization. Single-row and double-row cuff repairs can both be performed arthroscopically. Proponents of the double-row procedure prefer that technique for its footprint restoration and stronger biomechanical fixation; however, the double-row procedure can result in overtensioning of the repair and can lead to medial-based rotator cuff failures. Proponents of the single-row procedure prefer that technique for its ease of operation, fewer implants, lower cost, and low repair tension; however, the single-row procedure fixes the tendon at a single point, limiting the repaired footprint, and can be associated with lower fixation strength. The arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair achieves all of the above goals as it provides strong initial fixation and anatomic footprint restoration, which allows maximal patient biology for healing. Expected outcomes: There are numerous studies that can attest to the success of arthroscopic transosseous repair. Some of the benefits include decreased health-care costs and postoperative pain levels. In a 2016 study of 109 patients undergoing arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair, Flanagin et al. reported a mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score of 95 and a failure rate of 3.7% at mid-term follow-up1. Similarly, in a study comparing transosseous repair to transosseous equivalent repair, Srikumaran et al. reported that patients undergoing transosseous repair had a mean ASES score of 92 and a failure rate of 14%, with no significant differences between treatment groups2. Finally, in a study assessing the results of arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair at >10 years postoperatively, Plachel et al. reported a mean ASES score of 92 and a failure rate of 27%3. Important tips: Compared with conventional rotator cuff with anchors, the transosseous cuff repair can lead to cut-out of the repair sutures from the bone.Use a 4-portal arthroscopy technique, which will help the surgeon visualize all tear configurations while instrumenting them.Perform just enough bursectomy, in order to preserve the growth factors for cuff healing.Take care to minimize tuberosity trauma as a result of burring.Prepare the transosseous tunnels with a wide bone bridge.Load each tunnel with 3 high-strength sutures in order to maximize repair strength.Restore the rotator cuff footprint to facilitate tissue healing. Acronyms and abbreviations: ASES = American Shoulder and Elbow SurgeonsRCR = rotator cuff repairATRCR = arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repairARCR = arthroscopic rotator cuff repairPDS = polydioxanone sutureROM = range of motionSSV = Subjective Shoulder ValueFF = forward flexionOR = operating roomFU = follow-up.

An Underrated Performer in Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: Single-row Suture Anchor Technique

Single Versus Double-Row Repair of the Rotator Cuff

Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Technique for Repairing Rotator Cuff Tears: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Outcomes of Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Using a Novel All-Suture Soft Anchor Medial Row

Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations

A network meta-analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Single-row, double-row, and transosseous equivalent techniques for isolated supraspinatus tendon tears with minimal atrophy: A retrospective comparative outcome and radiographic analysis at minimum 2-year followup

Clinical Outcomes and Repair Integrity After Double-Row Modified Mason-Allen Repair Technique With a Single Knot in Small to Medium Supraspinatus Tears

Anchorless Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair

All-Suture and Solid Medial Row Anchors Produce Similar Clinical Outcomes for Double Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair (227)

The Relationship Between All-Suture and Solid Medial-Row Anchors and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Double-Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair

An assessment of the functional outcomes of patients undergoing early exercise physiotherapy following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the double-row suture bridge technique

A Modified Arthroscopic Triple‐row Repair Technique for L‐shaped Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears

An All-Suture Anchor Offers Equivalent Clinical Performance to an Established Solid Suture Anchor in the Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial with 12-Month Follow-Up

Arthroscopic Single-Row Modified Mason-Allen Repair Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Reconstruction for Supraspinatus Tendon Tears

Mid-term Results after Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

Single-Row Or Double-Row Fixation Technique For Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis

Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a retrospective comparison of double-layer, double-row and suture bridge methods

An All-Suture Anchor Offers Equivalent Clinical Performance to an Established Solid Suture Anchor in the Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Trial With 12-Month Follow Up

Comparison of Repair Integrity and Functional Outcomes for 3 Arthroscopic Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques

The early clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture-bridge technique for full-thickness rotator cuff tears