Abstract:Abstract Background Incorporating Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) into doctoral research is valued by PhD funders and scholars. Providing early career researchers with appropriate training to develop skills to conduct meaningful PPI involvement is important. The Health Research Board (HRB) Collaborative Doctoral Award in MultiMorbidity programme (CDA-MM) embedded formal PPI training in its structured education. The four participating PhD scholars established a PPI panel comprising people living with two or more chronic conditions, presenting an opportunity for experiential PPI training. This study aimed to evaluate the process and impact of embedding PPI training in a structured PhD programme. Methods This study was a longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation, conducted over 24 months (June 2020 to June 2022). A process evaluation provided an understanding of how PPI was embedded and explored the experiences of key stakeholders involved. An impact evaluation assessed the impact of embedding PPI training in the programme. Participants included PhD scholars, PPI contributors and PhD supervisors. The data collection and analysis was led by an independent researcher not aligned with the CDA-MM. Data collection methods included five focus groups, individual interviews (n = 6), an impact log, activity logs and group reflections. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic and content analysis and quantitative data analysed using descriptive statistics. Results Embedding formal and experiential PPI training in a structured PhD programme is feasible. Both approaches to training are fundamental to building PPI capacity. Involvement of an experienced and knowledgeable PPI lead throughout is perceived as critical. The PPI panel approach offered a good example of embedded consultation and worked well in a structured PhD programme, providing PhD scholars with ample opportunities for learning about PPI and its implementation. For PPI contributors, culture was the most important indicator of quality and was positively evaluated. Key roles for PhD supervisors were identified. Embedding formal and experiential PPI training impacted positively on many different aspects of individual PhD research projects and on PhD scholars as researchers. There were positive impacts for PPI contributors and PhD supervisors. Conclusions Embedding formal and experiential PPI training in a structured PhD programme is a novel approach. The evaluation has identified a number of lessons that can inform future doctoral programmes seeking to embed formal and experiential PPI training.

Up-skilling the next generation of researchers to analyse complex linked population-level datasets: ADR UK PhD studentships case study

Embedding formal and experiential public and patient involvement training in a structured PhD programme: process and impact evaluation

Digital Inclusion in Nothern England: Training Women from Underrepresented Communities in Tech: A Data Analytics Case Study

Preparing UK PhD students towards employability: a social science internship programme to enhance workplace skills

Supporting healthcare professionals from ethnic minority backgrounds to 'Step Into' a clinical academic career

How an international research programme can contribute to improvements in the research environment: the perspective of doctoral students in sub-Saharan Africa

Working Towards an Inclusive Research Culture Through EDI Education, Engagement and Empowerment of the Research Community

Enablers and barriers to engaging under-served groups in research: Survey of the United Kingdom research professional's views

Dementia Experts for Involvement Network-Young Dementia [DEfIN-YD]: Developing a national network of younger people with dementia prepared to get involved in research.

Making research everybody's business-Innovation to introduce Foundation doctors to research

Supporting the Biomedical Science UG Project Research Journey Through Staff-Student Partnerships

Using reflective practice to support PhD students in the biosciences

How policy can help develop and sustain workforce capacity in UK dementia research: insights from a career tracking analysis and stakeholder interviews

How to address the inverse care law and increase GP recruitment in areas of socioeconomic deprivation: a qualitative study of GP trainees' views and experiences in the UK

Data at your fingertips: How the Integrated Data Service is helping to promote collaboration and efficient decision-making in the UK

Monitoring the Pathways and Outcomes of People from Disadvantaged Backgrounds and Graduate Groups

A governance framework for facilitating cross-agency data sharing

The Impact of Postgraduate Leadership Development Fellowships for Doctors-in-Training: Reflections from a Fellow's Experience and a Narrative Literature Review

Exploring Student Engagement and Outcomes: Experiences from Three Cycles of an Undergraduate Module

International recruitment of radiographers and the development of a workplace integration support package: Project evaluation

Enacting strategies for graduate employability: How universities can best support students to develop generic skills (SP13 ‐3258)