Hong Kong's response to the fight against doxxing

Rebecca Ong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795241267290
2024-08-02
Common Law World Review
Abstract:Doxxing is a form of cyber harassment. The easy accessibility and increased usage of social media platforms have made it easier for the malicious publication of personal information to harass, threaten, and injure people online and in the real world. The harms caused are amplified because the information is released to a ‘broad and unknowable audience’ and once released, it cannot be erased. The city-wide protests in June 2019 against the Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019 resulted in city-wide doxxing against police officers, judicial officers and political dissidents. This paper has a two-fold objective. First, it examines the amendments made to the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance 1996, (Cap. 486) to consider whether the amendments had achieved its objective of reducing the number of doxxing incidents and providing an adeqaute remedy for doxxing victims. Second, a comparative analysis is made of the position in the UK, Singapore and New Zealand to learn how the Territory's Ordinance might be improved. The paper concludes with a suggestion for a review of the anti-doxxing provisions to ensure a balance between protecting individual information privacy and freedom of expression.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?