Abstract:Joint property distribution has been regulated in the Islamic Law Compilation (KHI), namely, Article 97 which explains that a widow or widower is entitled to half of the joint property. The distribution is fair if the husband and wife make the same contribution in the marriage. However, in fact, today we often find that wives are being the backbone of the family while husbands do not earn a living or husbands earn a living for the family, but wives do not take care of the household. If such a situation is found, is the article 97 of KHI still relevant? This paper presents a concept of joint property distribution based on the contribution of husband and wife in marriage which is considered fairer for both of them than what has been stipulated in the KHI and the Civil Code Articles 128-129. The type of research used is descriptive research. This means that research is discussed in the form of an explanation described in words carefully and thoroughly. The approach method used in this research is a normative juridical approach. The results of this study explain that to obtain the justice, judges can act contra legem (against the law) where justice should give a share to everyone based on his services or contributions (Aristotle). The joint property distribution in marriage from a justice perspective is the distribution of joint property by assessing the amount of contribution of the parties. A fair share does not have to be 50% for widowers and 50% for widows. The husband can get a smaller share from the wife if the contribution is less during the marriage and does not carry out his obligation as the breadwinner and the wife can get a larger share from the husband if the wife plays a dual role, and vice versa.Pembagian harta bersama telah diatur dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam yakni pada pasal 97 dijelaskan bahwa janda atau duda berhak separuh dari harta bersama. Pembagian tersebut adil apabila suami dan istri memberikan kontribusi yang sama dalam perkawinan. Akan tetapi pada faktanya saat ini sering kita temui istri menjadi tulang punggung keluarga sedangkan suami tidak mencari nafkah atau suami mencari nafkah untuk keluarga akan tetapi istri tidak mengurus rumah tangga. Jika ditemukan keadaan seperti itu apakah masih relevan KHI pasal 97 tersebut. Tulisan ini menyajikan sebuah konsep pembagian harta bersama berdasarkan kontribusi suami istri dalam perkawinan yang dinilai lebih adil untuk keduanya daripada apa yang sudah diatur dalam KHI dan KUHPerdata Pasal 128-129. Hasil dari penelitian ini dijelaskan bahwa untuk mendapatkan sebuah keadilan hakim dapat bertindak contra legem (mengenyampingkan undang-undang) dimana keadilan itu seharusnya memberikan bagian kepada setiap orang didasarkan atas jasa-jasanya atau kontribusinya (aristoteles). Pembagian harta bersama dalam perkawinan jika dilihat dari perspektif keadilan adalah pembagian harta bersama dengan menilai besaran konstribusi para pihak. Dimana pembagian yang adil tidak harus 50 % untuk duda dan 50% untuk janda. suami bisa mendapatkan bagian yang lebih kecil dari istri apabila kontribusinya kurang selama perkawinan dan tidak menjalankan kewaibannya sebagai pencari nafkah dan istri bisa mendapatkan bagian yang lebih besar dari suami jika istri berperan ganda, begitu uga sebaliknya.

Juridical Review Of Sharing Joint Assets As Banking Credit Collateral

Juridical Study of Bank Secrets Regarding Collective Assets in the Form of Deposits post Constitutional Court Ruling Number 64/Puu-X/2012 Concerning Customer Data and Their Savings for the Purpose of Division of Gono Gini's Property in a Civil Divorce Cases

Legal Effects Of Bankruptcy On Marital Couples Without A Marital Agreement

MARITAL PROPERTY IN INDONESIA

Marital Property within the Marriage Law: A Debate on Legal Position and Actual Applications

The Concept of Joint Property Ownership of Husband and Wife

Division Of Joint Property Between Spouses In Islamic Jurisprudence And The Laws Of Some Arab Countries

The Implementation Of Grant Of Marriage Properties Distribution Through Conciliation Agreement

Analysis of Judges' Legal Considerations Against the Sale of Joint Assets Without the Wife's Agreement in the Study of Positive Law in Indonesia

“A Juridical Review Towards The Land Rights Ownership In Mixed Marriage”

The Legal Standing of the Creditor Who Made a Marital Separation Agreement as a Petitioner for Bankruptcy

Legal Protection of Concurrent Creditors for The Debts That are not Guaranteed by Property Rights According to Bankruptcy Law and Islamic Law

Marriage Agreements as Legal Protection of Collective Property

Legal Consequences of Marriage Agreement that is Made After The Marriage Exists for Husband and Wife Who Have Debts

Intellectual Property as An Object of Banking Credit Collateral in The Digital Era

Adjudicating Joint Property Dispute in Islamic Jurisprudence: Balancing The Best Interests of The Child With A Focus on Residency

Joint Property Distribution upon Divorce Reviewed From the Contribution of Husband and Wife in the Household

Legal Reconstruction of Intellectual Property Rights as Joint Property in Marriage Based on Justice Value

ARRANGEMENTS REGARDING PROPERTY AS A LEGAL CONSEQUENCE OF PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS IN MIXED MARRIAGE

The decision on joint properties in Bengkulu High Religious Court Jurisdiction

A Legal Analysis on Novation of Joint Business Loan Due to Debtor's Divorce