Abstract:Global climate change is one of the most important and promising phenomena to study in actual time. One of the key causes of global climate change is increasing the greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations in the atmosphere [IPCC, 2023]. The main greenhouse gases are methane, carbon dioxides and nitric oxide, which contribute to the greenhouse effect and global warming [Lashof, Ahuja, 1990]. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is one of the most significant and widespread gases involved in the planet's global carbon cycle [Lashof, Ahuja. 1990]. At the same time, living organisms play a key role in creation of atmosphere composition. Autotrophic organisms use a carbon dioxide to build their body structures, including complex organic compounds. During ecosystem functioning, the part of the carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere through organism respiration, while another part is released through the decomposition of dead organic matter. Carbon dioxide may also be produced through natural and anthropogenic processes. Peatland ecosystems play a significant role in the planet's carbon cycle, both locally and globally. Peatlands in their natural undisturbed state are a significant long-term carbon sink1. However, the process of carbon deposition is not constant – in different years, peatlands may serve either as carbon sink or source2. The main factor stimulating the carbon sequestration by peatland ecosystems is climatic conditions [Harenda et al., 2018; Bond-Lamberty et al., 2018]. Peatlands are the second most significant carbon stock on Earth and the largest on land. Despite covering only 2.84% of the Earth's land surface, the amount of soil organic carbon stored in them accounts for about one-third of all soil organic carbon on Earth. Peatlands in the northern hemisphere play a particularly important role in carbon sequestration, with an estimated accumulated carbon quantity of ~473–621 Gt of carbon [Yu et al., 2010]. The largest area of peatlands in Russia is located in Western Siberia, estimated at ~42% of the total Russian area [Vomperskiy et al., 1994; Sheng et al., 2004]. The territory of Western Siberia is featured to a high share of peatlands in original undisturbed state, making them an ideal location to study the impact of global changes on peatland biogeochemical functioning worldwide. The carbon balance of peatlands is mainly determined by two processes: photosynthesis and respiration [Harenda et al., 2018]. The main factors influencing the CO2 flux from peatlands are photosynthetically active radiation, atmospheric air temperature (Tavg), soil temperature (Tsoil), and water table level (WTL) [Miao et al., 2013; Juszczak et al., 2013; Dyukarev et al., 2019]. At the same time, the level of mutual influence and the degree of determination have not yet been fully determined. To study the carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems, the chamber method [Davidson et al., 2002] is widely used. The chamber method allows to estimate the CO2 flux from the surface of the ecosystem. At the same time, the use of the modern automatic system LI-COR LI-8100A (LI-COR, USA) provides high-frequency continuous data on carbon dioxide fluxes over a long period of time, which makes it possible to assess the total accumulation of carbon and significantly improve the reliability of the identified relationships with environmental factors [Zarov et al., 2022]. The purpose of this study was to assess carbon dioxide flluxes and discover the main hydrometeorological parameters that influence the flow in the hollows of the Mukhrino raised bog. MATERIALS AND METHODS The research was carried out at the «Mukhrino» field station [Dyukarev et al., 2021], located in the central part of Western Siberia, 30 km southwest of the city of Khanty-Mansiysk. The climate is featured by high repeatability of anticyclonic conditions, rapid changes in weather conditions, a humid, moderately warm summer, and a fairly harsh, snowy winter. The chamber system was installed in a homogeneous area of the peatland, dominated by Sph. balticum, C. limosa, and Scheuchzeria palustris, with the presence of E. vaginatum on the periphery. The plant composition inside the chambers was not determined, but the most homogeneous and similar areas were selected for installation (Figure 2). Carbon dioxide flux measurements were carried out using the automated chamber method, using a portable soil respiration analysis system LI-8100A (LI-COR, USA). The flues were measured by four automated chambers installed in the raised bog area of Mukhrino (Figure 3). The first group of chambers – NEE (2 LI-COR 8100-104s chambers), measured net ecosystem exchange (NEE); the second group – Reco (2 LI-COR 8100-104 cameras), measured ecosystem respiration (Reco). Measurements were taken for 2 minutes every 30 minutes for all cameras. Wooden walkways were installed in the peatland area to minimize potential negative impacts on the study surface. The fluxes were calculated using a linear model of specialized software LI-8100 File Viewer 3.0.0 (LI-COR). R programming language packages dplyr [Wickham, 2016], ggplot2 [Wickham, 2016], lubridate [Grolemund, Wickham, 2011] were used for data processing and visualization. To analyze the dynamics of NEE and Reco fluxes, the obtained values were averaged between LI-COR 8100-104s chambers (for NEE) and LI-COR 8100-104 chambers (for Reco). Gross primary production (GPP) was calculated using the equation GPP=NEE-Reco [Connolly et al., 2009]. For further analysis, measurements with a coefficient of determination (R2) of linear regression above 0.5 were selected to minimize significant noise in the data. Spearman's rank correlation method was chosen to identify dependencies of flux on hydrometeorological properties. The dependence was determined based on the data of the flux and hydrometeorological properties averaged over 30 minutes. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The average daily variation of CO2 flows for July, September, October 2021 is shown in Fig. 5. The simultaneous use of dark and light chambers allowed to assess the flows that are released in the ecosystem as a result of the respiration of plants, animals and microorganisms (Reco), the intensity of CO2 absorption in the process photosynthesis (GPP), and net ecosystem exchange (NEE), which is the difference between the specific absorption rate (GPP) of carbon dioxide excretion (Reco). The average daily variation of Reco (Fig. 5) in July was featured by the highest values during daylight hours; the CO2 flux reaches its maximum value at 11:00 (1.44 μmol m‐2s‐1). For September and October, the daily dynamics of Reco were weakly expressed. The highest CO2 emissions were typical for evening and night time. The maximum Reco in the daily cycle was observed at 19:00 (0.47 μmol m‐2s‐1) for September, and at 00:00 (0.17 μmol m‐2s‐1) for October. The average daily cycle of GPP (Fig. 5) had a pronounced absorption maximum during daylight hours with maximum radiation, for July – at 11:00 (-3.47 μmol m‐2s‐1), for September – at 12:00 (-1.53 μmol m‐2s‐1), for October – at 11:00 (-0.45 μmol m‐2s‐1). The absorption of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (GPP) had different daily durations depending on the month (Fig. 5), which is associated with a decrease in daylight hours by autumn. In July, carbon dioxide absorption was observed from 4:00 to 20:00 (16 hours), in September – from 5:00 to 18:00 (13 hours), in October – from 7:00 to 17:00 (10 hours). For the diurnal cycle of NEE (Fig. 5), the CO2 absorption process (GPPReco) predominated in the daytime, while the carbon dioxide emission process (GPPReco) dominated at night. The maximum NEE value in the daily cycle in July was estimated at 1.01 μmol m‐2s‐1 at 22:00, in September 0.49 μmol m‐2s‐1 at 20:00, in October 0.17 μmol m‐2s‐1 at 21:00. The minimum NEE value in July was -2.03 μmol m‐2s‐1 at 11:00, in September: -1.01 μmol m‐2s‐1 at 12:00, in October 0.39 μmol m‐2s‐1 at 11:00. A total of 1711, 2625 and 1597 Reco measurements were taken in July, September and October, respectively. The highest average daily rate of ecosystem respiration Reco occurred in the third ten days of July (July 19); by the last days of October, ecosystem respiration reached its minimum in the annual course (Fig. 7). The average Reco in July was 1.05±0.25 μmol m‐2s‐1, and in October 0.13±0.01 μmol m‐2s‐1. These estimates were obtained on a sufficient array of data and therefore can be considered reliable. The peak intensity of photosynthesis was recorded on July 22, when vegetation absorbed the largest amount of CO2. After July 22, there was a gradual decline in GPP; the rate of carbon dioxide absorption in the last days of October decreased significantly, but did not drop to zero. The presence of photosynthesis in the hollow of an oligotrophic bog even in late autumn and at low air temperatures is probably due to the activity of sphagnum mosses. Net ecosystem exchange (Fig. 7) was negative every day in July, thereby the absorption of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere daily dominated its release. In September, ecosystem absorption of carbon dioxide prevailed until September 10, after which both negative and positive NEE values were observed. During this period, intense precipitation occurred, a decrease in air temperature and the amount of incoming radiation, which led to the ecosystem switching from a sink to a temporary source of CO2. In October, the number of days on which the ecosystem acted as a carbon sink decreased; on most days, carbon dioxide emissions predominated. According to average monthly values, carbon dioxide absorption prevailed in July (-0.53±0.13 μmol m‐2s‐1) and September (-0.11±0.18 μmol m‐2s‐1), in October (0.02±0.04 μmol m‐2s‐1) CO2 evolution predominated. The number of measurements according to NEE (Table 2) is greatest in September (2584) and least in July (1709). Reco was most influenced in July (Table 3) by air and soil temperature; in September – soil temperature and marsh water level. In October, when daily temperature variability decreased, the most significant factor for Reco was PAR (-0.59). The degree of correlation of Reco with Tavg and Tsoil in July qualifies as high; these factors are directly related to Reco – the higher the temperature, the greater the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by the ecosystem. This is caused by an increase in the activity of microorganisms under the influence of increased temperature [Nikonova et al., 2019]. In September, the influence of Tsoil (0.81) and water level (-0.78) increased, while the influence of Tavg (0.54) decreased. The degree of correlation of these parameters with Reco in September was classified as high. It is assumed that the strong influence of water level (-0.78) on the Reco flux in September may be associated with a sharp rise in water level (Fig. 6F), which could lead to a disruption of the optimum life activity of microorganisms. Similar flow behavior was found for North American peatlands [Miao et al., 2013]. In October, the greatest influence on Reco was exerted by PAR (-0.59), the degree of correlation is weak negative; At the same time, the correlation of the indicator with PAR in July was weakly positive. The highest correlation for GPP (Table 3) was obtained with photosynthetically active radiation for all months of the study. The PAR correlation level for all months was classified as high. The inverse correlation is due to the fact that as PAR increases, CO2 absorption increases (negative GPP flux). PAR is a key factor influencing plant photosynthesis, which in turn affects their ability to assimilate CO2 and produce GPP. As PAR intensity increases, plants increase the rate of photosynthesis and absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere faster, which increases GPP. The greatest influence on NEE was caused by PAR (Table 3) in July, in September and October (-0.91, -0.74 and -0.71, respectively). The level of PAR correlation in July and September was high, in October it was moderate. When PAR levels increase, plants use carbon dioxide more actively to produce organic matter and increase the level of GPP in the ecosystem, which leads to an increase in NEE flux. On the other hand, when PAR levels decrease, plants become less active in photosynthesis, which leads to the prevalence of Reco and a decrease in NEE flux. Analysis of correlation coefficients calculated from data for the entire field season, the best relationship for Reco was found with soil temperature (0.88), air temperature (0.71) and water level (-0.73). PAR has the greatest influence on GPP (-0.89) and NEE (-0.73). CONCLUSIONS Automated high temporal resolution chamber measurements of carbon dioxide flux provided a data for analyzing CO2 fluxes in the peatland area. The results provided detailed information that was used to analyze the impact of environmental hydrometeorological parameters on the flux. The highest ecosystem respiration (Reco) value during a 24-hour period was recorded in July at 11:00 (1.44 μmol m‐2s‐1), in September at 19:00 (0.47 μmol m‐2s‐1), and in October at 00:00 (0.17 μmol m‐2s‐1). The maximum gross primary production (GPP) for all months occurred between 11-12 hours: in July at 11:00 (-3.47 μmol m‐2s‐1), in September at 12:00 (-1.53 μmol m‐2s‐1), and in October at 11:00 (-0.45 μmol m‐2s‐1). By autumn, the duration of GPP throughout a day decreased, as well as the amplitude of diurnal variation for all flux indicators. The highest average daily CO2 flux for all indicators was recorded in July, while the lowest was in October. In net ecosystem exchange (NEE), absorption predominated from July 14 to September 9, with days dominated by ecosystem respiration from September 10 onwards. The amplitude of the average daily flux for all indicators decreased by October. Based on the Spearman correlation data, the highest seasonal correlation for ecosystem respiration (Reco) was with soil temperature (0.88), air temperature (0.71), and water level (-0.73). In July, the best correlation is with air temperature (0.70) and soil temperature (0.68), in September with soil temperature (0.81) and water level (-0.78), and in October with photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) (-0.59). Gross primary production (GPP) correlates best with PAR. In July, the correlation coefficient is -0.95, in September -0.86, in October -0.79, and for the entire field season -0.89. Net ecosystem exchange (NEE), similar to GPP, is most dependent on PAR. In July, the correlation coefficient is -0.91, in September -0.74, in October -0.71, and for the entire field season -0.73. In general, the article calculates carbon dioxide fluxes from the surface of a hollow in an oligotrophic peatland. The seasonal and average daily dynamics of hydrometeorological properties are described, and their influence on CO2 flows is assessed. It is worth noting that throughout the entire growing season, the influence of external factors on fluxes decreases, reaching a minimum mutual correlation in the coldest month (October).

Abstract:General characteristic of approaches of Russian and Western European phytosociologists to the typology of territorial units of vegetation is presented in the paper. Two-dimensional classification of vegetation proposed by V. Sochava (1968) is the basis of Russian approaches, in which 2 classification categories are identified: phytocenomers and phytocenochores. Homogeneous territorial vegetation units are represented by phytocenoses of a certain syntaxa (phytocenomer), then 3 main types are distinguished within heterogeneous units: complexes, ecological series, and ecological-genetic series (Rachkovskaya, 1963; Guricheva, 1965; Isachenko, 1967; Gribova, Isachenko, 1972). In Western European phytocoenology, the approach to the analysis of territorial vegetation units was introduced by R. Tüxen, who in the 1970s created the foundations of the research topic called symphytosociology (Tüxen, 1973, 1978). He developed the approach to include different levels of syntaxa in the classification of territorial units of vegetation. In 1973, R. Tüxen proposed a methodology for the study of vegetation complexes and the method for converting syntaxa into sigma-syntaxa. In 1981, J.-M. Géhu and S. Rivas-Martínez suggested sigmetum as the main unit of symphytosociology. In 1982, S. Rivas-Martínez proposed the tesela as an elementary territorial unit of chorology and phytogeography. Tesela corresponds to the environmentally homogeneous area and includes communities of one sigmeta. The next level of plant cover organization is the catena — territorial vegetation unit determined by geomorphological features of the area. A catena includes several teselas spatially arranged in a mosaic or arranged in belts following to one or more environmental gradients. Geosigmetum or geoseries is the main typological unit of vegetation of the catena. We took into account the disadvantages of these approaches in the development of a proprietary typological scheme. The lack of a rigorous methodology for allocation and identifying territorial units of vegetation, absence of generally recognized nomenclature, and only intuitive level of allocation of the units themselves are disadvantages of the Russian school. The symphytosociological approach is formal in the scientific terms since it does not take into account the important structural features of the territorial units of vegetation. This approach simplifies their characterization to a list of syntaxa and their combinations and is limited to only two levels of the hierarchy (sigmetum and geosigmetum). The approaches to the typology of territorial units of vegetation, currently used in symphytosociology, are a copy of phytosociological ones. Despite this, the logic of map legend formation differs from the principles of vegetation classification. We propose the types of structures (ecological-genetic series, ecological series, complexes) of the existing communities’ combinations to take as a basis of the typological scheme. They reflect the quintessence of the “ecological basis” of phytocenochore habitats, namely the distribution features, intensity, direction, and the result of the interaction between environmental factors. The unification of territorial units of vegetation is carried out based on real and regularly repeated combinations of higher rank (from micro- to meso- level and so on). This allows us to reflect levels of a hierarchical organization of vegetation in the typology and nomenclature. The vegetation of the Barents sea coastal marches was chosen as a model object due to the well-studied syntaxonomic composition and pronounced spatial patterning. This patterning appears mainly due to the discrete gradation of the prevailing environmental factors: the degree of salinity and moisture of the substrate. Within the framework of the typological scheme, the most general categories of territorial units are identified. They correspond to the basic levels of the hierarchical organization of vegetation cover — division, class, and type, which are highly likely to be common to any mapped territory, regardless of its zonal disposition. For a more complete display of the structure and complexity of the spatial organization of phytocenochores, 3 auxiliary categories were introduced — subclass, group, and subtype. Division — is the highest unit of a typological scheme that combines the territorial units of vegetation of a particular natural area confined to such geomorphologic structures as following: 1) watersheds covering the area between the edge of the slopes of the bed-rock terraces in river valleys; 2) river valleys exposed to the flooding regime, the boundaries of this geomorphologic structures are drawn on the edge of the slope, which separates the valleys from the watershed areas; 3) low marine terraces variably flooded by tidal waters, this geomorphologic structure is limited by the bed-rock terrace slope edge. Class is the subordinated unit within the division. They combine topographically well differed territorial units of vegetation, in which the composition of syntaxa and syntaxon combinations reflect the ecological specificity of simple relief forms of the same origin (i. e. hill, ridge, runoff hollow, lake depression, floodplain, etc.) or their elements (slopes, terraces). Phytocenochores of the class rank are formed by combinations of communities, different in ecology (palsa-bogs, coastal marshes, etc.). This is due to the specific distribution and influence of environmental factors and their combinations within the class. The syntaxonomic composition of communities and their combinations within the class reflects the position of vegetation territorial units in the landscape and their habitats’ ecological distinctiveness. The territorial units of vegetation of the same class within different subzones and geobotanical districts can differ significantly in composition (diagnostic syntaxa and the main elements of their combinations) due to the zonal and regional originality. It is the basis for their allocation to the rank of subclass. Phytocenochores of subclasses are usually not territorially conjugate and belong to different units of geobotanical zoning (subzones, geobotanical districts). The class of territorial units of Barents Sea coastal marshes is divided into salt and brackish marsh subclasses. They belong to different geobotanic districts and are considered as ecological variants of coastal marsh class with a uniqueness of composition of syntaxa and their combinations. Within the class/subclass of vegetation territorial units, phytocenochores of meso- or macro-level are often clearly distinguished, discretely, or continually replacing each other along the gradient of leading environmental factors. They were allocated to the rank of group, each is physiognomically distinct and represented by a continuum or relatively homogeneous mosaic of syntaxa and their combinations. The composition of diagnostic syntaxa and their combinations, reflecting the ecological peculiarity of the habitats of this typological unit and the class (subclass) as a whole, is preserved within the group. Groups are territorially conjugate and represent elements within a uniform ecological or ecological-dynamic series of communities and their combinations. The definition of groups, as well as subclasses, can be problematic because of the complexity of the geomorphological features. This is the reason why this typological unit has an auxiliary character. Type — the basic elementary unit of the typological scheme, displayed mainly on maps of large and medium scales. To distinguish the type two main criteria are being applied as follows: 1) the type of spatial structure, and 2) syntaxonomic composition of the elements of the vegetation territorial unit. As a type the following phytocenochores can be recognized: 1) phytocenoses; 2) simple combinations of the first supraphytocenotic level (ecological-genetic series, ecological series, complexes); 3) complex combinations that include a combination of phytocenochores of the first 2 types. The types represented by heterogeneous territorial units of vegetation include complete combinations of all possible elements of phytocenochores (series, ecological series, etc.) that can occur in the conditions of type habitats. Usually, within the phytocenochores, combinations of communities are represented by the selective set of syntaxa represented in the complete combinations. For a comprehensive inventory of the regional territorial units, diversity, and its reflection on the maps, auxiliary typological unit of subtype rank is introduced, which manifests the internal variability of a certain type and reflects the completeness of the type representation in a particular territory. For the names of typological units of different ranks, it is proposed to use the names of diagnostic syntaxa of association and lower rank, since they most reflect the local and regional originality of the mapping area. The Brown-Blanquet approach to the classification of vegetation, as the methodically most developed among others nowadays, is the basis for the nomenclature of typological units. For the name of typological units, we propose to use the ending “-chorietum”, derived from phytocenochora (coenochora). It reflects the chorological aspect of the unit and intended to be used in the nomenclature for all of the territorial vegetation units categories — of any rank of complexity and to rankless territorial units. The term -chorietum is added to the name of the diagnostic syntaxon. For homogeneous territorial units, we propose to use syntaxon name, since any phytocoenosis is an elementary territorial unit of vegetation of the rank of association and below. For simple combinations (ecological-genetic series, ecological series, complexes), regardless of the number of their forming syntaxa, the names of two syntaxa are used. The ending -chorietum is added to the genus name of the taxon of diagnostic syntaxon. This reflects the first supraphytocoenotic level of the structural organization of the territorial unit of vegetation. If the diagnostic syntaxon has the rank of subassociation or variant, then name of the typological unit uses name of the association with the ending -chorietum, followed by the full name of the subassociation or variant. If the type of territorial units is represented by an incomplete series of syntaxa and is assigned to a subtype, then after the diagnostic syntaxon the ending -subchorietum is used. If the type is represented by a complex combination of phytocoenoses and their combinations, the name of the diagnostic syntaxon with the ending -synchorietum is used. When forming the names of typological units of class and lower rank, add the ending corresponding to their rank to the basis of the genus name of the taxon of the diagnostic association, that is, instead of the -etum ending, we use the ending corresponding to the rank of the territorial unit. If the basis of the genus name ends in a consonant, then we use the connecting vowel (“i” or “o” following to Appendix I of the ICPN). If the name of the rank of the phytocenochore consists of the names of two syntaxa, then the first diagnostic syntaxon is unchanged, and the ending corresponding to the rank is added to the last syntaxon. Examples: for class —-chorietea (Luzulo confusae–Salicichorietea nummulariae), subclass — -subchorietea(Puccinellisubchorietea phryganodis), group — -chorieteum(Caricichorieteum glareosae), type — -chorietum (Callitricho–Ranunculetum trichophylli—Carici rariflorae–Salicichorietum glaucae) and -synchorietum (Caricetum subspathaceae arctanthemetosum hulteni—Potamogetonosynchorietum filiformis), subtype — -subchorietum (Parnassio palustris–Salicetum reptantis—Scirpo–Hippuridosubchorietum tetraphyllae). To name division, which represents the highest rank, the term choriophyta is proposed. The term has been added to the Latin names of the divisions of the tundra zone, for example, watersheds — Tundra divortium choriophyta, river valleys — Tundra vallis choriophyta, low sea terraces — Tundra maritimes choriophyta. To describe and display the spatial structure of phytocenochore types represented by simple and complex combinations, it is proposed to use the set of symbols reflecting the structural features. Using the example of coastal marshes of the Haypudyrskaya Bay of the Barents Sea (Puccinellichorietea phryganodis), a typological scheme of territorial vegetation units was developed. The subclass of salt marshes (Puccinellisubchorietea phryganodis) was taken for a case study. Within the subclass 4 groups of 27 categories were selected to create the geobotanical map (1 : 25 000). Those categories are of the rank of types and subtypes of different complexity levels and 13 homogeneous and 14 heterogeneous are among them. In addition to them, 5 types of phytocenochores that intrude marshes from adjacent divisions have been identified. The application of the typological scheme allows taking into account not only the syntaxonomic composition and predominant combinations but also their patterning and complexity. This will largely reflect the originality of the vegetation of the given area, as well as habitas specificity, geomorphological and ecological features of the territory.

Spatial and temporal structure of mire landscapes: basic concept and approaches to classification

Low-sedge vegetation of waterlogged bog hollows and fens in the north of Western Siberia

A Case Study on the Microstructure of Fibrous Peat (West Lake, China)

Vegetation of segde-hypnum and wooded rich fens and swamps on the north border of their distribution in Western Siberia

Biogeochemistry of Peat Deposits of the Holocene Section of the Vydrino Bog (Southern Baikal Region)

Topography and Time Shape Mire Morphometry and Large‐Scale Mire Distribution Patterns in the Northern Boreal Landscape

Carbon Dioxide and Methane Distribution in Peat Deposits of an Oligotrophic Forest Swamp in Western Siberia and Their Emission

Peat definitions: A critical review

The influence of the hydrometeorological factors on the CO2 fluxes from the oligotrophic bog surface.

International Symposium “Mires of Northern Eurasia: biosphere functions, diversity and management” (Petrozavodsk, September 25–28, 2023)

Peat formation potential of temperate fens increases with hydrological stability

Numerical assessment of morphological and hydraulic properties of moss, lichen and peat from a permafrost peatland

A hierarchical, multi‐sensor framework for peatland sub‐class and vegetation mapping throughout the Canadian boreal forest

Rewetting and Drainage of Nutrient-Poor Peatlands Indicated by Specific Bacterial Membrane Fatty Acids and a Repeated Sampling of Stable Isotopes (δ15N, δ13C)

Annual growth and primary production of sphagnum in raised bog Mukhrino (four-year observations: 2019-2022)

A unified explanation for the morphology of raised peatlands

Pigment Complex, Growth and Chemical Composition Traits of Boreal Sphagnum Mosses (Mire System "Ilasskoe", North-West of European Russia)

Influence of permafrost on water storage in West Siberian peatlands revealed from a new database of soil properties

Typology and syntaxonomic composition of vegetation territorial units: novel approach suggested with the case study of Arctic marshes

Ecological Assessment of the Meadow Phytocoenoses in the Southern Part of Sakhalin

PEATMAP: Refining Estimates of Global Peatland Distribution Based on a Meta-Analysis